Appeal allowed – Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) – Section 302 – Murder – Even the evidence of a hostile witness can be considered to the extent, it supports the case of the prosecution –
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH MALTI SAHU — Appellant Vs. RAHUL AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : M.R. Shah and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ. ) Criminal Appeal No. 471…
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Section 27 A -HELD we are inclined to set aside the orders passed and dismiss the complaint. As there is no vicarious liability that can be fastened on the appellant and the appellant’s role cannot be stretched to the policy decision of the Republic of Philippines, the appeal stands allowed.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH HCMI EDUCATION — Appellant NARENDRA PAL SINGH — Respondent ( Before : Abhay S. Oka and M.M. Sundresh, JJ. ) Civil Appeal No. 2481…
The Government of India may consider the introduction of a separate enactment in the nature of a Bail Act so as to streamline the grant of bails.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH SATENDER KUMAR ANTIL — Appellant Vs. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : Sanjay Kishan Kaul and M.M. Sundresh, JJ.…
HELD any deposit made under or pursuant to the said order of High Court, cannot wipe out the default already committed by the defendant- respondent. On the contrary, with setting aside of the said order of the High Court, the order of the Trial Court shall stand revived.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH ASHA RANI GUPTA — Appellant Vs. SRI VINEET KUMAR — Respondent ( Before : Dinesh Maheshwari and Aniruddha Bose, JJ. ) Civil Appeal No.…
HELD services of the other work-charge employees even who were senior to the deceased employees were regularized in the year 2009 i.e. after the death of the deceased employee. Appeal of Stateallowed
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. NISHEVI ACHUMI — Respondent ( Before : M. R. Shah and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ. )…
NDPS bail – material placed on record nothing of any contraband article has been recovered from the respondent or from any place under his exclusive control. This factor further adds on to the doubt as to whether the respondent had at all been indulgent in narcotics or any contraband?
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH STATE OF WEST BENGAL — Appellant Vs. RAKESH SINGH @ RAKESH KUMAR SINGH — Respondent ( Before : Dinesh Maheshwari and Aniruddha Bose, JJ.…
HELD ex-parte judgment and decree passed by the learned Trial Court as well as the order(s) passed by the learned Trial Court refusing to condone the delay of 2345 days in preferring the revision petition(s) challenging the ex-parte judgment and decree filed by original defendant Nos. 2 to 4 is/are hereby restored
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH MOHAMED ALI — Appellant Vs. V. JAYA AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : M.R. Shah and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ. ) Civil Appeal No.…
Union of India prayed transferring all writs challenging the constitutional validity of the Payment of Bonus (Amendment) Act, 2015 HELD the prayer for transfer of the subject petitions is declined and all the interim stay orders are vacated while providing that it shall be permissible for the parties to request the respective High Courts for expeditious hearing and disposal .
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH UNION OF INDIA ETC. — Appellant Vs. THE UNITED PLANTERS ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN INDIA ETC. ETC. AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Dinesh…
Orissa Value Added Tax Act, 2004 – Section 42(6) – Audit assessment – Further time – Power of Commissioner/ Assessing Authority — Necessity for referring the matter to three-Judges is to have consistency and clarity in the law of precedents and certainly to avoid having multiple judgements drawing subtle distinction between one another.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX ODISHA AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. M/S. ESSEL MINING AND INDUSTRIES LTD AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : Uday…
Respondent being an OBC cannot be retained in a ST category post – Respondent is disentitled to any pensionary benefit by virtue of his wrongful appointment.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, BHILAI STEEL PLANT, BHILAI — Appellant Vs. MAHESH KUMAR GONNADE AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Sanjay Kishan Kaul…