POCSO Act – Lapse or omission (purposeful or otherwise) to carry out DNA profiling, by itself, cannot be permitted to decide the fate of a trial for the offence of rape especially, when it is combined with the commission of the offence of murder
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH VEERENDRA — Appellant Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH — Respondent ( Before : A.M. Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheshwari and C.T. Ravikumar, JJ. ) Criminal Appeal…
Flat-owners had the benefit of staying in the flats for a period of 8-9 years on an average HELD Flat-owners are not entitled for any interest on the amounts paid by them to the builders.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH THE KERALA STATE COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY MEMBER SECRETARY — Appellant Vs. MARADU MUNICIPALITY AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : L. Nageswara Rao…
A number of proceedings were initiated by respondent which he has delayed the proceedings initiated by the bank under the SARFAESI Act, and has stalled the recovery proceedings – Division Bench was not justified in initially granting an order of stay.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED — Appellant Vs. NARENDRA JAYANTILAL TRIVEDI AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : M. R. Shah and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ.…
Writ petition against order passed by NCDRC – Maintainability – Writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order passed by the National Commission which has been passed in an appeal under Section 58(1)(a) (iii) of the 2019 Act is maintainable
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH IBRAT FAIZAN — Appellant Vs. OMAXE BUILDHOME PRIVATE LIMITED — Respondent ( Before : M.R. Shah and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ. ) Civil Appeal No.…
In some circumstances, evidence of a deceased wife with respect to cruelty could be admissible in a trial for a charge under Section 498A of the IPC under Section 32(1) of the Evidence Act
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH SURENDRAN — Appellant Vs. STATE OF KERALA — Respondent ( Before : N.V. Ramana, A.S. Bopanna and Hima Kohli, JJ. ) Criminal Appeal No.…
Pre-mature release policy applicable in state where the crime was committed and not the State where the trial stands transferred.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH RADHESHYAM BHAGWANDAS SHAH @ LALA VAKIL — Appellant Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : Ajay Rastogi and Vikram Nath,…
Electricity Act, 2003 – Sections 2, 2(8), 9 and 24(2) – A combined reading of Section 9 and Clause (8) of Section 2 of the said Act would reveal that a person is entitled to construct, maintain or operate a captive generating plant – Such a plant should be primarily for his own use
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH CHHATTISGARH STATE POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED — Appellant Vs. CHHATTISGARH STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : L. Nageswara Rao…
HELD Since the appellant has deposited a total sum of Rs.3,84,546/ (including interest) against the total value/cost of Rs.2,70,000/.the plot being still vacant and not allotted to any other person, the order of cancellation may be set aside.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH ANJANA SARAIYA — Appellant Vs. THE STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : M.R. Shah and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ. ) Civil…
If an aggrieved person is not in a domestic relationship with the respondent – but has at any point of time lived so or had the right to live and has been subjected to domestic violence or is later subjected to domestic violence on account of the domestic relationship, is entitled to file an application under Section 12 of the D.V. Act.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH PRABHA TYAGI — Appellant Vs. KAMLESH DEVI — Respondent ( Before : M.R. Shah and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ. ) Criminal Appeal No. 511 of…
Depositories Act, 1996 – As per the 1996 Regulations, the pledgor/pawnor is not entitled to sell the pledged/pawned securities – the pawnor under the Contract Act and the common law has the right to redeem the pledged goods till ‘actual sale’ – Sale by the pawnee to self does not defeat the right of redemption of the pawnor – It may amount to conversion in law
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH PTC INDIA FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED — Appellant Vs. VENKATESWARLU KARI AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : M.R. Shah and Sanjiv Khanna, JJ. )…









