Posts of Constable (General) – If the information disclosed in the application form was found to be wrong and incomplete, such an application form was liable to be rejected at any stage of the selection process.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. CHETAN JEFF — Respondent ( Before : M.R. Shah and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ. ) Civil Appeal…
Order XXVI Rule 9 of the Code (CPC) gives wide powers to the court to appoint a commissioner to make local investigations which may be requisite or proper for elucidating any matter in dispute, ascertaining the market value of any property, account of mesne profit or damages or annual net profits.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH M.P. RAJYA TILHAN UTPADAK SAHAKARI SANGH MARYADIT, PACHAMA, DISTRICT SEHORE AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. M/S. MODI TRANSPORT SERVICE — Respondent ( Before :…
Process of delimitation work need not detain the issue of election programme by the State Election Commission, in respect of local bodies as and when it becomes due much less overdue, including where the same is likely to become due in the near future –
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH SURESH MAHAJAN — Appellant Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : A.M. Khanwilkar, Abhay S. Oka and C.T. Ravikumar,…
When the Pension Regulations and the GPF Scheme are read together, the necessary conclusion is that an employee must give his option for either continuing to be a member of the CPF Scheme or to switch over to the Pension and GPF Scheme. HELD that an employee had no inherent right to demand extension for exercising the switchover option.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH UNIVERSITY OF DELHI — Appellant Vs. SMT. SHASHI KIRAN AND OTHERS ETC. — Respondent ( Before : Uday Umesh Lalit and Vineet Saran, JJ.…
Uttar Pradesh State Universities Act, 1973 – Section 31 – Termination – Selection of the appellant was done after following the selection procedure as prescribed by the 1973 Act – Appellant had served for a period of 12 years before the order directing his termination was passed by Chancellor – Termination of appellant is not sustainable in law.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH RAM CHANDRA — Appellant Vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : L. Nageswara Rao and B.R. Gavai, JJ. )…
In the absence of any allegation of dishonest inducement, it cannot be said that accused has committed any offence under Section 420 of IPC for which she is accused charge-sheeted – Proceedings quashed – Appeal allowed.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH REKHA JAIN — Appellant Vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : M.R. Shah and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ. ) Criminal…
Entire selection process/recruitment process was found to be fraudulent and it was found that there was a manipulation in the resolution and as such no resolution was passed to appoint – Order of cancellation of appointment upheld.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH RESHMA SULTANA — Appellant Vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : M.R. Shah and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ. ) Civil…
Minimum Wages – when the earlier notification was issued after following the due procedure as required under Sections 4 and 5 of the Act, 1948, the same procedure ought to have been followed even while varying and/or modifying the notification – Hence, the notification could not have been modified by such an Errata Notification
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH GOMANTAK MAZDOOR SANGH — Appellant Vs. STATE OF GOA AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : M.R. Shah and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ. ) Civil…
Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 – Chapter III B – Kerala Money Lenders Act, 1958 and the Gujarat Money Lenders Act, 2011 will have no application to NonBanking Financial Companies (NBFCs) registered under the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 and regulated by Reserve Bank of India.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH NEDUMPILLI FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED — Appellant Vs. STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Hemant Gupta and V. Ramasubramanian, JJ. )…
Execution of document – in a situation where an individual admits their signature on a document but denies its execution, the Sub-Registrar is bound to refuse registration in accordance with Sections 35(3)(a) of the Registration Act –
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH VEENA SINGH (DEAD) THROUGH LR — Appellant Vs. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR/ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR (F/R) AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud,…