Service Archives - Page 22 of 82 - Supreme Court of India Judgements

Bihar Government Servant Contributory Pension Scheme, 2005 – No government employee appointed after 31.08.2005 shall be entitled to any other benefit except under the New Contributory Pension Scheme.

Jul 3, 2022 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH THE STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. RAJMATI DEVI AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : M.R. Shah and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ.…

Service

Departmental enquiry – High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution cannot review/re appreciate the evidence and to arrive at an independent finding on the evidence.

Jul 3, 2022 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ANOTHER — Appellant Vs. K.S. VISHWANATH — Respondent ( Before : M.R. Shah and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ. ) Civil…

Service

Central Civil Services (Fixation of Pay of Re-employed Pensioners) Order, 1986 – Para 8 – The reference to the last drawn pay in the armed forces is only to ensure that the pay computed in the civil post in the manner envisaged in para 8 of CCS Order does not exceed the basic pay (including the deferred pay but excluding other emoluments) last drawn by the personnel in the armed forces.

Jul 3, 2022 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH UNION OF INDIA — Appellant Vs. ANIL PRASAD — Respondent ( Before : M.R. Shah and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ. ) Civil Appeal No. 4073…

Service

Appeal allowed – Rejection of candidates on technical ground ground of non-production of original certificates at the time of interview was improper, unjustified and not warranted –

Jun 26, 2022 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH AARAV JAIN — Appellant Vs. THE BIHAR PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : S. Abdul Nazeer and Vikram Nath, JJ.…

Service

Service Law – Consequential benefits – appellants who are found to be eligible for promotion as per the existing rules and as directed by the learned Single Judge, would be extended all consequential benefits

Jun 26, 2022 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH KRISHNA RAI (DEAD) THROUGH LRS AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. BANARAS HINDU UNIVERSITY THROUGH REGISTRAR AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Dinesh Maheshwari…

Service

HELD perusal of the record would clearly reveal that an opportunity was given by the Appellate Authority to the Enquiry Committee to examine the important witnesses. Even on remand, the said three witnesses were not examined. Appeal dismissed

Jun 19, 2022 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. SURESH KUMAR SINGH — Respondent ( Before : B.R. Gavai and Hima Kohli, JJ. ) Civil…

Service

Civil Service – Re-medical examination – word ‘ordinarily’ has to be conjointly read with the word ‘maximum’ during which the candidate has to approach for re-medical examination from the date of uploading of the medical examination report on the website of the Department

Jun 19, 2022 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH UNION OF INDIA — Appellant Vs. K. RAJASHEKHARA REDDY AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : Ajay Rastogi and Vikram Nath, JJ. ) Civil…

Service

HELD the medical condition was kept in view by the No.1 Selection Board and all competent authorities, in the backdrop of employability and there is no other additional medical disability acquired by the respondent during the period of time lag, if any.

May 24, 2022 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. BRIGADIER JAVED IQBAL — Respondent ( Before : Indira Banerjee and A.S. Bopanna, JJ. ) Civil…

Service

HELD according to the said University, though the employment was contractual but the employee was entitled to get all the benefits of a regular employee – Appellant’s services could not have been terminated without following the principles of natural justice – Appellant is directed to be reinstated with continuity in service

May 15, 2022 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH K. RAGUPATHI — Appellant Vs. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : L. Nageswara Rao and B.R. Gavai, JJ.…

Service

Posts of Constable (General) – If the information disclosed in the application form was found to be wrong and incomplete, such an application form was liable to be rejected at any stage of the selection process.

May 15, 2022 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISON BENCH STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. CHETAN JEFF — Respondent ( Before : M.R. Shah and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ. ) Civil Appeal…

Bihar Government Servant Contributory Pension Scheme, 2005 – No government employee appointed after 31.08.2005 shall be entitled to any other benefit except under the New Contributory Pension Scheme.

Departmental enquiry – High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution cannot review/re appreciate the evidence and to arrive at an independent finding on the evidence.

Appeal allowed – Rejection of candidates on technical ground ground of non-production of original certificates at the time of interview was improper, unjustified and not warranted –

Service Law – Consequential benefits – appellants who are found to be eligible for promotion as per the existing rules and as directed by the learned Single Judge, would be extended all consequential benefits

HELD perusal of the record would clearly reveal that an opportunity was given by the Appellate Authority to the Enquiry Committee to examine the important witnesses. Even on remand, the said three witnesses were not examined. Appeal dismissed

Civil Service – Re-medical examination – word ‘ordinarily’ has to be conjointly read with the word ‘maximum’ during which the candidate has to approach for re-medical examination from the date of uploading of the medical examination report on the website of the Department

HELD the medical condition was kept in view by the No.1 Selection Board and all competent authorities, in the backdrop of employability and there is no other additional medical disability acquired by the respondent during the period of time lag, if any.

Posts of Constable (General) – If the information disclosed in the application form was found to be wrong and incomplete, such an application form was liable to be rejected at any stage of the selection process.

You missed

Limitation in consumer protection cases should be interpreted holistically, considering the continuing cause of action and prioritizing substantive rights over strict procedural time bars.

A suit in representative capacity (Order 1, Rule 8 CPC) is not maintainable if lacking locus standi, and a prior decree (res judicata) bars subsequent suits on the same subject matter, notwithstanding varying reliefs.

Agreement to sell immovable property incurs stamp duty as deemed conveyance via implied/symbolic possession transfer, with duty applying to the agreement (instrument), not the sale (transaction).

Supreme Court of India Judgements

Category: Service

You missed