Constitution Archives - Page 64 of 69 - Supreme Court of India Judgements

May 13, 2025 1:55 am

RIGHT TO PRIVACY – LANDMARK JUDGEMENT – 9 JUDGES BENCH -Right to Privacy—It is a fundamental right, subject to reasonable limitations. Constitution of India,1950, Article 21–Right to Privacy-It is a fundamental right-Right to privacy is protected as an intrinsic part of the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21 and as a part of the freedoms guarded by part III of the Constitution-All the 9 judges of Constitution Bench were of same view-Earlier view in Kharak Singh case (6 judges bench in 1964) and M.P. Sharma (8 judges bench in 1954) overruled.

Nov 12, 2017 sclaw

2017(3) Law Herald (SC) 1803 (LB) : 2017 LawHerald.Org 1337 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before Hon’bte Mr. Chief Justice Jagdish Singh Khehar Hon’ble Mr. Justice J. Chelameswar Hon’ble…

Constitution

Letter Patent Appeal—An order passed by the single judge in exercise of Article 226 of the Constitution relating to criminal jurisdiction, cannot be made the subject matter of intra-court appeal—It is not provided for and it would be legally inappropriate to think so. Quashing—Letter Patent Appeal against order of single judge under criminal jurisdiction is not maintainable.

Nov 11, 2017 sclaw

2017(3) Law Herald (P&H) 2079 (SC) : 2017 LawHerald.Org 1214 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dipak Misra Hon’ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar Hon’ble Mr. Justice…

Constitution

Judge’s record, as is well known, must be accepted as correct.

Nov 8, 2017 sclaw

2008(1) Law Herald (SC) 260 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.B. Sinha The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Harjit Singh Bedi Civil Appeal No. 5944 of…

Constitution

Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971-25 Weeks Pregnancy-Fetus without skull—No chance of survival of foetus

Oct 23, 2017 sclaw

2017(3) Law Herald (SC) 1729 : 2017 LawHerald.Org 1226 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.A. Bobde Hon’ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao Writ Petition (Civil)…

Constitution

Freedom of Expression—Exhibition of film ‘Indu Sarkar’ which refers to period of emergency—It is an artistic expression within the parameters of law-Prohibition on its release declined

Oct 9, 2017 sclaw

2017(2) Law Herald (SC) 1610 : 2017 LawHerald.Org 1141 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before Hon’ble Mr. Justice DipakMisra Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitava Roy Hon’ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar…

Constitution

Letter Patent Appeal—An order passed by the single judge in exercise of Article 226 of the Constitution relating to criminal jurisdiction, cannot be made the subject matter of infra-court appeal—It is not provided for and it would be legally inappropriate to think so. Quashing—Letter Patent Appeal against order of single judge under criminal jurisdiction is not maintainable.

Oct 6, 2017 sclaw

2017(2) Law Herald (SC) 1556 : 2017 LawHerald.Org 1214 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Befor.e Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dipak Misra Hon’ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mohan…

Constitution

Writ of Mandamus–Courts cannot issue any direction to the Parliament or to the State legislature to enact a particular kind of law.

Sep 15, 2017 sclaw

2007(5) LAW HERALD (SC) 3908 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice G.P. Mathur The Hon’ble Mr. Justice P.K. Balasubramanyan Civil Appeal No. 478 of 2006…

Constitution

Extention was also directed by High Court–Since as per Supreme Court’s order the mining operation in entire area is prohibited–Therefore no relief can be granted–Appeal dismissed.

Aug 27, 2017 sclaw

2007(5) LAW HERALD (SC) 3652 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarun Chatterjee The Hon’ble Mr. Justice P. Sathasivam Civil Appeal No. 5874 of…

Constitution

Resettlement of stranded persons – The learned Attorney General apart from reiterating the stand taken in their affidavit assured this Court that the Government of India is fully committed to provide all required financial assistance as well as security measures for the immediate and permanent relief to the stranded and affected persons

Aug 20, 2017 sclaw

(2013) 11 SCALE 676 : (2013) 9 SCC 328 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA MOHD. HAROON AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. UNION OF INDIA (UOI) AND ANOTHER — Respondent (…

Constitution

Service Law—Sporting a beard—Muslim Airman—Religion of personnel does not prohibit the cutting off the hair or shaving off the face of its members-Permission held to be rightly declined, Service Law-Sporting of beard-Armed Forces-Appellant, an Airman belonging to Muslim Religion sought permission to sport a broad on religious grounds-Permission declined-Order upheld-Held;

Aug 9, 2017 sclaw

2017(1) Law Herald (SC) 351 : 2016 LawHerald.Org 2533 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Chief Justice T.S. Thakur The Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud The…

You missed

Service

Under Rule 17, CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, prior contractual service counts towards pension upon subsequent regularisation, subject to the employee opting to refund/forgo specified monetary benefits.

May 6, 2025 sclaw

I B C

Service of an IBC Section 8 demand notice upon Key Managerial Personnel at the Corporate Debtor’s registered office constitutes valid service on the company, emphasizing substance over technical form.

May 6, 2025 sclaw

Cr P C

High Court’s inherent power to quash criminal proceedings precludes conducting a ‘mini trial’ by assessing evidence credibility; consistency requires acknowledging coordinate bench decisions involving co-accused.

May 5, 2025 sclaw

Cr P C

Quashing FIR under 482 CrPC impermissible when complaint prima facie discloses cognizable offences; allegations accepted true, investigation not thwarted based on delay, civil suit, or witness status if complicity alleged.

May 5, 2025 sclaw

Category: Constitution

You missed