Circumstantial Evidence Archives - Page 2 of 2 - Supreme Court of India Judgements

May 31, 2025 1:48 pm

Indian Penal Code, 1860, S.302–Murder–Circumstantial Evidence-Before a person is convicted entirely on circumstantial evidence, the Court must be satisfied not only that those circumstances are consistent with his having committed the act,

Aug 4, 2017 sclaw

2017(1) Law Herald (SC) 328 : 2016 LawHerald.Org 2497 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr, Justice Pinaki Chandra Ghose The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitava Roy Criminal…

You missed

C P C

Appellate court should decide on merits based on document interpretation when possible, rather than unnecessarily remanding, particularly when area and boundaries are consistent.

May 30, 2025 sclaw

Electricity Act

Determination of ‘change in law’ compensation and carrying cost at LPS rates is governed by PPA restitutionary principles, effective from the event date, requiring supplementary billing after competent forum adjudication.

May 30, 2025 sclaw

Constitution

Fundamental right under Article 22(1) requires meaningful communication of valid arrest grounds for lawful detention, failure vitiates arrest.

May 30, 2025 sclaw

Cr P C

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Section 482 — Discretionary power — Exercise of — Quashing of proceedings at advanced stage of trial — Even if trial advanced, where dispute purely commercial, fully settled with no outstanding dues, and no continuing public interest, continuation of criminal proceedings amounts to abuse of process and can be quashed.

May 30, 2025 sclaw

Category: Circumstantial Evidence

Indian Penal Code, 1860, S.302–Murder–Circumstantial Evidence-Before a person is convicted entirely on circumstantial evidence, the Court must be satisfied not only that those circumstances are consistent with his having committed the act,

You missed

Appellate court should decide on merits based on document interpretation when possible, rather than unnecessarily remanding, particularly when area and boundaries are consistent.

Determination of ‘change in law’ compensation and carrying cost at LPS rates is governed by PPA restitutionary principles, effective from the event date, requiring supplementary billing after competent forum adjudication.

Fundamental right under Article 22(1) requires meaningful communication of valid arrest grounds for lawful detention, failure vitiates arrest.