Regularisation of the services — The Respondents appear to have approached the M.P. State Administrative Tribunal at Jabalpur in appeal, which was dismissed by the Tribunal holding that it had no jurisdiction to entertain the same as the Respondents were not employees/civil servants under the State Government —
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CONTROLLER, GOVT. PRINT. AND STATIONERY PRESS AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. RASHIDA B. AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Vikramajit Sen, J; T.S. Thakur,…
Central Excise Tariff – Item 26AA(ia), 25(8) – Classification of elastic rail clips – Learned Counsel for the appellant that a Special Bench of five members of Central Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal has considered the same question and taken the view in favour of the assessee that elastic rail clips are classifiable under Item 26AA(ia)/25(8)
(1998) 77 ECR 439 : (1997) 92 ELT 5 : (1998) 4 JT 439 : (1997) 8 SCC 483 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA VEE KAY INDUSTRIES — Appellant Vs.…
Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 – Sections 5, 6 and 9 – Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) – Sections 323, 504, 117, 366A and 373 – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) – Sections 437(5) and 439(2) – Rescue of young girls and children from red light area – Challenge to order passed by High Court whereby bail was granted to respondent –
(2010) CriLJ 1433 : (2009) 14 JT 37 : (2009) 15 SCC 75 : (2009) 11 SCR 761 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA GURIA, SWAYAM SEVI SANSTHAN — Appellant Vs.…
Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 – Section – 16 – Constitution of India, 1950 – Article – 136 – Registeration of deed of adoption
(1998) 8 SCC 693 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA LAL MAN — Appellant Vs. DY. DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : N. P. Singh, J; K.…
Refund of amount then they should produce the relevant records, duly certified by a competent authority which is acceptable in a Court of law, indicating the sources from which they got the money for repayment
(2014) 2 SCALE 569 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA v S.E.B.I. — Appellant Vs. SAHARA INDIA REAL. ESTATE CORPN. LTD. AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : K.S. Panicker Radhakrishnan,…
Punjab Civil Services Rules – Rule 6.16-B(a) – Appointment – Whether the brother of the deceased employee who died in harness is eligible for employment on compassionate grounds –
(1996) 1 AD 827 : (1996) 2 LLJ 691 : (1996) 1 SCALE 605 : (1996) 7 SCC 262 : (1995) 6 SCR 175 Supp : (1996) 1 UJ…
There was a re-count of the rejected votes and, therefore, no grievance could be made on that count and so far as the dead electors are concerned, only at the best, four persons took the ballot papers as deposed by the Tehsildar and even if it is assumed that those four persons voted for the successful candidate, it does not materially affect the election – Appeal dismissed.
(1998) 8 SCC 695 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA SATHI ROOP LAL — Appellant Vs. MALTI THAPAR (MRS) — Respondent ( Before : A. M. Ahmadii, C.J; B. N. Kirpal,…
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 34, 120B, 302, 364A, 386, 511 —Conviction for offence — The Appellant aggrieved by his conviction for offence under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced — the recovery of The dead body on the statements made by the accused from the house in their possession has been proved.
(2014) 1 CCR 398 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA VIJAY KUMAR — Appellant Vs. STATE (NCT) OF DELHI — Respondent ( Before : J.S. Khehar, J; C.K. Prasad, J )…
Payment of No. 35 per month to UDCs discharging special duties of onerous nature, is personal pay so long as they discharge the same. Therefore, other UDCs who do not perform the special duties, though seniors, do not ipso facto get the same pay on the posit of equal pay due to juniors getting higher pay
(1996) 1 AD 980 : (1996) 83 ELT 485 : (1996) 1 JT 709 : (1996) 1 SCALE 696 : (1996) 7 SCC 275 : (1996) 1 SCR 841 :…
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of this case, the High Court ought not to have taken a strict view of the matter because the delay was not deliberate and there was nothing on the record to show that the appellant had acquiesced in the matter
(1998) 8 SCC 698 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA MANICKRAM — Appellant Vs. BALUKHAN — Respondent ( Before : A. M. Ahmadii, C.J; Sujata V. Manohar, J; B. N. Kirpal,…