Service Law–Compassionate appointment–Family was not found to be financially in indigent condition–Indication as to on the basis of which materials the conclusion was arrived at should be provided.
2007(4) LAW HERALD (SC) 2819 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dr. Arijit Pasayat The Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.H. Kapadia Civil Appeal No. 4058 of…
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996—Arbitral Award—Contract on turkey basis–Dispute arose—Arbitral Tribunal formed
2007(4) LAW HERALD (SC) 2805 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice A.K. Mathur The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Markandey Katju Civil Appeal No. 4079-80 of 2007…
Service Law—Retrial Benefits—Non compliance of order–Order cannot be made ineffective by not complying with the directions on a specious plea that no such directions could have been issued by the Court.
2007(4) LAW HERALD (SC) 2796 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice C.K. Thakker The Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.K. Jain Civil Appeal No. 4108 of 2007…
Ship Breaking—Detailed recommendations suggested by committee of technical experts and the concerned Statutes are amended to be in line with the recommendations. Until the Code comes into play, the recommendations shall be operative
2007(4) LAW HERALD (SC) 2786 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Arijit Pasayat The Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.H. Kapadia Writ Petition (Civil) 657 of 1995…
Service Law—Retrial Benefits—Counting of past service—Respondent not entitled as the requirements of statute dealing with subject not fulfilled.
2007(4) LAW HERALD (SC) 2780 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice G.P. Mathur The Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.K. Jain Civil Appeal No. 4102 of 2007…
Service Law—Stoppage of increment–Major penalty–In the absence of specific Regulations, withholding of increments with cumulative effect is treated as a major penalty because it has a perpetual effect.
2007(4) LAW HERALD (SC) 2775 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dr. Arijit Pasayat The Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.K. Jain Civil Appeal No. 4041-42…
Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Section 304B – Dowry death – Dying declaration – Deceased was fed up with activities of her husband and she poured kerosene oil on herself and burnt herself – Dying declaration of deceased as well as evidence of PW are sufficient to establish that appellant used to fight on petty issues and give beatings deceased
(2013) 11 AD 453 : AIR 2014 SC 227 : (2013) 14 JT 357 : (2013) 4 RCR(Criminal) 964 : (2013) 13 SCALE 410 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION…
the High Court set aside the order of termination – Court find that the respondent was given a copy of the order of cancellation of the certificate passed by the Tahsildar, Nowrangpur and he also signed in lieu of the receipt of the copy of the said order. In view of the fact that the petitioner was given a copy of the order of cancellation of certificate the High Court was not justified in holding that the respondent was not confronted with the order of cancellation of certificate. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent then urged that the respondent was denied an opportunity of personal hearing before the disciplinary authority – Appeal allowed.
(2000) 1 LLJ 275 : (1999) 9 SCC 268 : (1999) SCC(L&S) 1228 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA STATE BANK OF INDIA AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. LUTHER KONDHPAN —…
Service Law – Appointment – Search-cum- Selection Committee, after scrutinizing qualification and experience of short- Listed candidates, unanimously placed Respondent first in merit list – Acceptance of lesser salary cannot ipso facto conclude that acceptance of position was to abuse authority
(2013) 12 AD 157 : (2014) 1 CompLJ 39 : (2013) 14 JT 563 : (2013) 13 SCALE 442 : (2014) 2 SCC 609 : (2014) 1 SCC(L&S) 433…
High Court was to remit the matter to the Government for Constitution of the DPC to consider his fitment for promotion in later period, in that event, the DPC would go into the merits afresh and find out whether the respondent would be fit for promotion. If he would be found fit and recommendation is made in that behalf, the Government would appoint him on regular basis and he would get seniority only from the date of his promotion
(1997) 10 JT 628 : (1997) 3 SCALE 337 : (1997) 4 SCC 424 : (1997) SCC(L&S) 975 : (1997) 2 SCR 1133 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA STATE OF…