Third proviso to Section 254(2A) of the Income Tax Act will now be read without the word “even” and the words “is not” after the words “delay in disposing of the appeal” – Any order of stay shall stand vacated after the expiry of the period or periods mentioned in the Section only if the delay in disposing of the appeal is attributable to the assessee.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANOTHER — Appellant Vs. M/S. PEPSI FOODS LTD. (NOW PEPSICO INDIA HOLDINGS PVT. LTD.) — Respondent ( Before…
Appointment of arbitrator – Section 11 court would refer the matter when contentions relating to non-arbitrability are plainly arguable, or when facts are contested – The court cannot, at this stage, enter into a mini trial or elaborate review of the facts and law which would usurp the jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH SANJIV PRAKASH — Appellant Vs. SEEMA KUKREJA AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Rohinton Fali Nariman, B.R. Gavai and Hrishikesh Roy, JJ. )…
Possession of 1 kg heroin – Commercial quantity – Quantity of substance with which an accused is charged is a relevant factor, which can be taken into consideration while fixing quantum of the punishment.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH GURDEV SINGH — Appellant Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB — Respondent ( Before : Dr. Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud and M. R. Shah, JJ. ) Criminal…
Winding up of company – while exercising its powers under sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act would not be in a position to decide, as to who was at fault in not complying with the terms and conditions of the deed of settlement and the compromise deed.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH SHITAL FIBERS LIMITED — Appellant Vs. INDIAN ACRYLICS LIMITED — Respondent ( Before : R.F. Nariman, B.R. Gavai and Hrishikesh Roy, JJ. ) Civil…
Compassionate Employment Cannot Be Granted After A Lapse Of Reasonable Period
Though the reasons given by the employer to deny the relief sought by the Respondent are not sustainable, we are convinced that the Respondent’s son cannot be given compassionate appointment…
Jurisdiction of the High Court to examine the correctness, legality and propriety of determination of any dispute by the Tribunal is reserved with the High Court – Nomenclature of the proceedings as a petition under Article 226 or a petition under Article 227 is wholly inconsequential and immaterial.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH KIRAN DEVI — Appellant Vs. THE BIHAR STATE SUNNI WAKF BOARD AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Ashok Bhushan, S. Abdul Nazeer and…
Medical prescription, of Ayurvedic doctor and the remedies prescribed belie claim that there was no serious ailment – Serious allegations in the FIR in regard to the harassment suffered by the deceased -High Court not justified in granting bail – Appeal allowed.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH SONU — Appellant Vs. SONU YADAV AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud and M. R. Shah, JJ. ) Criminal…
Recovery of huge quantity (3332 kgs.) of ‘Ganja’ (cannabis) carried on truck – Appellant was helper of truck – He was only 22/23 years of age at the time of incident and first time offender – Nothing was recovered from his custody – appropriate to reduce the sentence of imprisonment to the period already undergone,
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH M. SAMPAT — Appellant Vs. THE STATE OF CHHATISGARH — Respondent ( Before : Indira Banerjee and Krishna Murari, JJ. ) Criminal Appeal No.…
Seriousness Of Charge Relevant Factor : Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail Granted To Man Accused Of Murdering Lady Doctor
“The High Court, in our opinion, clearly erred in not appreciating that the apprehension of the Prosecution that the Respondent Accused would influence witnesses, could not be put to rest,…
Senior counsel for the petitioner referred WhatsApp chat between the petitioner and prosecutrix of December 2020 which has been brought on the record from page 47 to page 54 of the paper book – Petitioner has made out a prima facie case for grant of anticipatory bail
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH JUDE LOBO — Appellant Vs. STATE, NCT OF DELHI — Respondent ( Before : Ashok Bhushan and S. Abdul Nazeer, JJ. ) Petition(s) for…








