Service Archives - Page 13 of 82 - Supreme Court of India Judgements

April 6, 2025 2:05 am

Work Charged Establishment Revised Service Conditions (Repealing) Rules, 2013 – Rule 5(v) – Pension – after rendering of service as work charged for number of years and thereafter when their services have been regularized, they cannot be denied the pension on the ground that they have not completed the qualifying service for pension – That is why, the service rendered as work charged is to be counted and/or considered for the purpose of qualifying service for pension

May 7, 2023 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH UDAY PRATAP THAKUR AND ANOTHER — Appellant Vs. THE STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : M.R. Shah and C.T. Ravikumar,…

Service

Once the respondents were permanently absorbed and became an employee of the Dairy Development Corporation / Milk Federation Unions, they ceased to have the lien with the State Government and therefore, they shall not be entitled to the pensionary benefits as State Government employees

May 7, 2023 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. DR. HAMIR SINGH CHOUHAN (DEAD) BY LRS AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : M.R. Shah…

Service

Service Law – Seniority – Once on re-evaluation, the marks are increased the respective candidates whose marks are increased will have to be placed at appropriate place in the merit list – Non-grant of seniority based on revised marks, thus, would render the process of re-evaluation redundant.

May 3, 2023 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH SUNIL AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. HIGH COURT OF DELHI AND OTHERS ETC. — Respondent ( Before : M.R. Shah and Sanjay Karol, JJ.…

Service

HELD appellants had already got three promotions before they got themselves transferred to Kerala University. The salary drawn by them of the higher post was protected – special class of employees were already drawing salary of the higher post which in terms of the policy for inter-university transfer was protected, though they were placed at the bottom of the seniority at the entry level.

May 3, 2023 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH SMT. SASIKALA DEVI. P — Appellant Vs. THE STATE OF KERALA AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : Abhay S. Oka and Rajesh Bindal,…

Service

Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921 – Section 16-FF – held that the selection process concludes only after the mandatory approval of the District Inspector of Schools is granted – there is no rule for a deemed appointment.

May 1, 2023 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. RACHNA HILLS AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI.…

Service

By the very nature of the science that they practice and with the advancement of science and modern medical technology, the emergency duty that Allopathy doctors are capable of performing and the trauma care that they are capable of providing, cannot be performed by Ayurved doctors – both categories of doctors are certainly not performing equal work to be entitled to equal pay

Apr 30, 2023 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH STATE OF GUJARAT AND OTHERS ETC. — Appellant Vs. DR. P. A. BHATT AND OTHERS ETC. — Respondent ( Before : V. Ramasubramanian and…

Service

Appellants are entitled to financial upgradation under the ACP Scheme on completion of requisite regular service ignoring the higher qualification prescribed for the next higher post as grant of such benefit is not actually a promotion but only financial upgradation and if the higher qualification is insisted it would frustrate the purpose of the entire scheme.

Apr 30, 2023 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH AMRESH KUMAR SINGH AND OTHERS .ETC.ETC. — Appellant Vs. THE STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS .ETC.ETC. — Respondent ( Before : B.R. Gavai and…

Constitution Service

Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 14 – Penalty imposed must be commensurate with the gravity of the misconduct, and that any penalty disproportionate to the gravity of the misconduct would be violative of Article 14 of the Constitution – In the armed forces of the Union, including the paramilitary forces, utmost discipline, unity of command et al are the sine qua non – That said, the doctrine of proportionality still holds the field.

Apr 16, 2023 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH B. S. HARI COMMANDANT — Appellant Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. R1: UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS R2: DIRECTOR GENERAL, BORDER…

Service

HELD Merely because, the government servant has retired on the very next day, how can he be denied the annual increment which he has earned and/or is entitled to for rendering the service with good conduct and efficiently in the preceding one year.

Apr 14, 2023 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH THE DIRECTOR (ADMN. AND HR) KPTCL AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. C.P. MUNDINAMANI AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : M.R. Shah and C.T.…

Service

Creation and sanction of posts is a prerogative of the executive or legislative authorities and the court cannot arrogate to itself this purely executive or legislative function, and direct creation of posts in any organisation.

Apr 14, 2023 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH THE GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR. ETC. ETC. — Appellant Vs. TAMIL NADU MAKKAL NALA PANIYALARGAL AND ORS. ETC. ETC. — Respondent (…

You missed

Arbitration

S. 34(3) Arbitration Act | Application Filed On Next Working Day After 90 Day Period Is Within Limitation

Apr 5, 2025 sclaw

Service

Teacher In-Service As On Aug 10, 2017 With 18-Month D.El.Ed. From NIOS Before Apr 1, 2019 ‘At Par’ With 2-Yr Diploma Holder

Apr 5, 2025 sclaw

Cr P C

In a case involving cross-FIRs (alleging offences u/s 294(b), 323, 506(1) IPC) arising from a dispute between two practicing advocates pending since 2017, the Supreme Court, in the exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 142 of the Constitution, quashed the FIR against the appellants and also quashed the connected proceedings

Mar 29, 2025 sclaw

I P C

Conviction under Section 302 requires proof of premeditation or intention to kill; absence of such elements may lead to reduced charges, such as under Section 304 IPC, with sentencing considerations potentially based on time already served

Mar 25, 2025 sclaw

Category: Service

You missed