Property Tax—Not leviable on Mobile Towers,
2017(1) Law Herald (SC) 311 : 2016 LawHerald.Org 2526 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Prafulla C. Pant C/v/7…
Punjab Municipal Corporation Act, 1976, S.103–House Tax-Specific Exemption»-In view of the specific exemption given under the lease deed regarding payment of any taxes on the demised premises, the appellant-Company is not at all required to pay any municipal taxes on the demised premises
2017(1) Law Herald (SC) 306 : 2018 LawHeraid.Org 2493 ‘ IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Anil R, Dave The Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.K. Agrawal…
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 – Section 76(c) – Mortgage – Redemption of – Mortgagee claiming himself to be in occupation of land as tenant – No consent of mortgagor for creation of tenancy by mortgagee – In terms of mortgage deed – Mortgagee neither managed property as a tenant nor inherited tenancy rights under Tenancy Act – Mortgagee cannot claim any tenancy right in respect of land.
(2001) 1 JT 401 : (2000) 8 SCALE 463 : (2000) 5 SCR 756 Supp : (2001) AIRSCW 9 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA PURAN CHAND (D) THROUGH LRS. AND…
Redemption of Mortgage—Provision in the agreement that the mortgagee will have a right of pre-emption, operates as a clog on the right of redemption of the mortgagor.
2007(4) LAW HERALD (SC) 3261 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Jusitce A.K. Mathur The Hon’ble Mr. Jusitce Markandey Katju Civil Appeal No. 3008 of…
Specific Relief Act, 1963 – Section – 16(c) – Specific performance of a contract – Appeal from the judgment of the High Court of Karnataka decreeing the suit filed by the Respondents for specific performance of contract for sale of the suit land executed by the Appellant-Defendant in favour of the Respondents- Plaintiffs
(2000) 8 JT 13 : (2000) 9 SCC 214 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA BORAMMA — Appellant Vs. KRISHNA GOWDA AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Shivaraj V. Patil,…
Settlement deed – At the time of settlement, appellant was the owner of the superstructure of the building having a possessory title to the land belonging to the Government. In 1972, patta was granted by the Government in respect of the site – Whether a settlement deed is valid in law
(1998) 8 SCC 465 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DAGANI RAMADAS — Appellant Vs. P. DAVEED AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : K. Ramaswamy, J; G. T. Nanavati, J…
The High Court was in error while coming to the conclusion that the Appellant had no right in the plot in question and the impugned judgment as well as the order passed in Company Application are quashed and set aside and it is held that the plot in question does not belong to the Company in liquidation and the official liquidator has no right to deal with the plot or dispose of the plot and it would be open to the Appellant-Corporation to deal with or allot the plot as per its policy
2014) 2 AD 285 : AIR 2014 SC 618 : (2013) 15 JT 327 : (2013) 14 SCALE 231 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA THE A.P.I.I. CORPORATION LTD. — Appellant…
Transfer of Property Act, 1882, S,58(e)–Mortgage by conditional sale
2017(1) Law Herald (SC) 160 : 2016 LawHerald.Org 2452 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.K. Agrawal The Hon’ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi Civil Appeal…
Family Settlement—Family settlement could only be if one has lawful right over the property and then alone family settlement could be executed.
2007(4) LAW HERALD (SC) 3028 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice A.K. Mathur The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Markandey Katju Civil Appeal No. 4361 of…
Whether in absence of any execution and registration of deed of sale by the Government in favour of the Company, any interest in the land has been and could be created, from the letter of allotment, agreement and a letter?–Matter reffered to larger bench.
2007(4) LAW HERALD (SC) 2737 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.B. Sinha The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Markandey Katju Civil Appeal No. 7824-7828 of…