I P C Archives - Page 39 of 58 - Supreme Court of India Judgements

Rape–Accused took away prosecutrix–In absence of marriage, a person will be guilt of abduction and rape.

Jan 25, 2019 sclaw

2009(1) LAW HERALD (SC) 268 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dr. Arijit Pasayat The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dr. Mukundakam Sharma Criminal Appeal No.100 of…

I P C

Murder–Husband gave single blow to wife–Act was committed without premeditation, in a sudden fight in the heat of passion upon a sudden quarrel–Conviction altered from Section 302 I.P.C to 304 Part-I I.P.C.

Jan 24, 2019 sclaw

2009(1) LAW HERALD (SC) 261 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Arijit Pasayat The Hon’ble Mr. Justice G.S. Singhvi Criminal Appeal No. 885 of 2005…

I P C

Attempt to Murder–A single blow of sickle inflicted by appellant on back of deceased–Doctor opinion that deceased did not died due to direct result of injury–Reduction of charges proper.

Jan 17, 2019 sclaw

2009(1) LAW HERALD (SC) 241 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Lokeshwar Singh Panta The Hon’ble Mr. Justice B. Sudershan Reddy Criminal Appeal No. 47…

I P C

Criminal Complaint–Preliminary Inquiry under Section 202 Cr.P.C.–Although an accused has no right to participate unless the process is issued, he may remain present either in person or through a counsel or a agent with a view to be informed of what is going on. Cognizable Offence–Information to police–Even in a case where no action is taken by police, the informant’s remedy lies under Section 190 and 200 of the Cr.P.C.

Jan 12, 2019 sclaw

2009(1) LAW HERALD (SC) 219 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.B. Sinha The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Cyriac Joseph Criminal Appeal No. 2054 of 2008…

I P C

Appeal—Remand of Case—High Court only with the narration of facts dismissed the appeal without examining the evidence of each prosecution witnesses on issues arising in appeal—Matter remanded back

Jan 6, 2019 sclaw

2018(4) Law Herald (SC) 3393 : 2018 LawHerald.Org 1942 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before Hon’ble Mr. Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Indu Malhotra Criminal Appeal No.…

I P C

Rape–Courts cannot award sentence below seven years in offence of rape without giving adequate and special reasons

Jan 4, 2019 sclaw

2009(1) LAW HERALD (SC) 150 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.B. Sinha The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Cyriac Joseph Criminal Appeal No. 2060 of 2008…

I P C

Common Intention–Even a past enmity by itself may not be a ground to hold for drawing any inference of formation of common intention amongst the parties. –Criminal Law–Common Intention–It is well settled that Section 34 of IPC does not create a distinct offence, it only lays down the principle of joint criminal liability–The necessary conditions for the application of Section 34 of Code are common intention to commit an offence and participation by all the accused in doing act or acts in furtherance of common intention–Penal Code, 1860, Section 34.

Jan 2, 2019 sclaw

2009(1) LAW HERALD (SC) 131 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.B. Sinha The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Cyriac Joseph Criminal Appeal No. 2067 of 2008…

I P C

Rape–Law no were provides that it is not possible for a single man to commit sexual inter course with a healthy adult female in full possession of her sense against her will.

Jan 1, 2019 sclaw

2009(1) LAW HERALD (SC) 114 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dr. Arijit Pasayat The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dr. Mukundakam Sharma Criminal Appeal No. 2044…

I P C

Acquittal by High Court–Order of High Court utterly confusing and based on surmises and conjectures–Matter remitted to High Court for fresh hearing.

Dec 31, 2018 sclaw

2009(1) LAW HERALD (SC) 52 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dr. Arijit Pasayat The Hon’ble Mr. Justice P. Sathasivam The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Aftab…

I P C

Cheating—Quashing—Merely on the allegation that wife had not completed her M.C.A qualification at the time of marriage as claimed and she has completed M.C.A after the marriage, it cannot be said that the appellants had cheated husband at the time of marriage

Dec 30, 2018 sclaw

2018(4) Law Herald (SC) 3261 : 2018 LawHerald.org 1785 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before Hon’ble Mr. Justice N. V. Ramana Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar Criminal Appeal…

Rape–Accused took away prosecutrix–In absence of marriage, a person will be guilt of abduction and rape.

Murder–Husband gave single blow to wife–Act was committed without premeditation, in a sudden fight in the heat of passion upon a sudden quarrel–Conviction altered from Section 302 I.P.C to 304 Part-I I.P.C.

Attempt to Murder–A single blow of sickle inflicted by appellant on back of deceased–Doctor opinion that deceased did not died due to direct result of injury–Reduction of charges proper.

Appeal—Remand of Case—High Court only with the narration of facts dismissed the appeal without examining the evidence of each prosecution witnesses on issues arising in appeal—Matter remanded back

Rape–Courts cannot award sentence below seven years in offence of rape without giving adequate and special reasons

Rape–Law no were provides that it is not possible for a single man to commit sexual inter course with a healthy adult female in full possession of her sense against her will.

Acquittal by High Court–Order of High Court utterly confusing and based on surmises and conjectures–Matter remitted to High Court for fresh hearing.

Cheating—Quashing—Merely on the allegation that wife had not completed her M.C.A qualification at the time of marriage as claimed and she has completed M.C.A after the marriage, it cannot be said that the appellants had cheated husband at the time of marriage

You missed

Limitation in consumer protection cases should be interpreted holistically, considering the continuing cause of action and prioritizing substantive rights over strict procedural time bars.

A suit in representative capacity (Order 1, Rule 8 CPC) is not maintainable if lacking locus standi, and a prior decree (res judicata) bars subsequent suits on the same subject matter, notwithstanding varying reliefs.

Agreement to sell immovable property incurs stamp duty as deemed conveyance via implied/symbolic possession transfer, with duty applying to the agreement (instrument), not the sale (transaction).

Supreme Court of India Judgements

Category: I P C

You missed