NIRBVHAYA TRIAL : Convict, Mukesh writ dismissed.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH MUKESH — Appellant Vs. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI — Respondent ( Before : R. Banumathi, Ashok Bhushan and A.S. Bopanna, JJ. )…
NIRBHAYA TRIAL :: Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 32 – Rejection of Mercy Petition – Review of – Torture in the prison cannot be a ground for review of the order of rejection of the Mercy Petition by the President of India – Petition dismissed.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH AKSHAY KUMAR SINGH — Appellant Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. — Respondent ( Before : R. Banumathi, Ashok Bhushan, and A.S. Bopanna,…
Public Interest Also Shall Be Demonstrated Before Writ Remedy Is Sought In Tender Matters: SC HELD “In addition to arbitrariness, illegality or discrimination under Article 14 or encroachment of freedom under Article 19(1)(g), public interest too is demonstrated before remedy is sought.”
Public Interest Also Shall Be Demonstrated Before Writ Remedy Is Sought In Tender Matters: SC [Read Judgment] LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK 18 March 2020 5:38 PM “In addition to arbitrariness, illegality…
SC Restrains Manipur BJP Minister From Entering Legislative Assembly Till Further Orders HELD Needless to add, he will cease to be a Minister of the Cabinet immediately.
SC Restrains Manipur BJP Minister From Entering Legislative Assembly Till Further Orders [Read Order] LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK 18 March 2020 5:52 PM “Needless to add, he will cease to be…
High Court In Article 226 Proceedings Does Not Adjudicate Correctness Of Allegations In FIR: SC HELD “The Court may only intervene in exceptional cases, if the allegations made in the FIR ex facie do not disclose any offence at all.”
High Court In Article 226 Proceedings Does Not Adjudicate Correctness Of Allegations In FIR: SC [Read Judgement] LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK 13 March 2020 4:37 PM “The Court may only intervene…
Unreasoned Decisions Delivered On Technical Grounds Without Entering Into Merits Are Not Binding Precedents: SC HELD “It can never be in a summary manner, much less be rendered in a decision delivered on technical grounds, without entering into the merits at all. “dismissal of a case by it on the ground of delay in filing/non-filing is not a binding precedent.
Unreasoned Decisions Delivered On Technical Grounds Without Entering Into Merits Are Not Binding Precedents: SC [Read Judgment] LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK 12 March 2020 10:31 AM “It can never be in…
Sexual Harassment At Workplace Is An Affront to Women’s Fundamental Rights: SC
Sexual Harassment At Workplace Is An Affront to Women’s Fundamental Rights: SC [Read Judgment] Ashok Kini 10 March 2020 9:24 PM Sexual harassment at the workplace is an affront to…
Right To Information Act, 2005 – Sections 6(2), 11, 19, 22 and 28 – Information to be accessed/certified copies on the judicial side to be obtained through the mechanism provided under the High Court Rules, the provisions of the RTI Act shall not be resorted to.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH CHIEF INFORMATION COMMISSIONER — Appellant Vs. HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : R. Banumathi, A.S. Bopanna And Hrishikesh Roy,…
VIRTUAL CURRENCY (VC) CASE :: Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 – Section 45JA and 45L – Banking Regulation Act, 1949 – Section 35A read with 36(1)(a) and 56 – Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007 – Section 10(2) read with Section 18 – Virtual currencies – Position as on date is that VCs are not banned
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH INTERNET AND MOBILE ASSOCIATION OF INDIA — Appellant Vs. RESERVE BANK OF INDIA — Respondent ( Before : Rohinton Fali Nariman, Aniruddha Bose and…
Constitution of India, 1950 – Articles 14, 19 (1) (a), 19 (1) (c) and 21 – Organisation of political nature – Any organisation which habitually engages itself in or employs common methods of political action like ‘bandh’ or ‘hartal’ ,’rasta roko’, ‘rail roko’ or ‘jail bharo’ in support of public causes can also be declared as an organisation of political nature, according to the guideline prescribed in Rule 3 (vi) – Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH INDIAN SOCIAL ACTION FORUM (INSAF) — Appellant Vs. UNION OF INDIA — Respondent ( Before : L. Nageswara Rao and Deepak Gupta, JJ. )…