Cr P C Archives - Page 51 of 53 - Supreme Court of India Judgements

September 13, 2025 4:37 pm

Revision petition was treated to be one under Section 482 of the Code, though styled as one under Section 401–Impugned order set aside for fresh disposal.

Apr 24, 2017 sclaw

2007(3) LAW HERALD (SC) 2333 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Arijit Pasayat The Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.K. Jain Criminal Appeal No. 927 of…

Cr P C

Release of vehicle—Section 457 of Cr.P.C. has no application for offence committed under Wild Life (Protection) Act.

Apr 24, 2017 sclaw

2007(3) LAW HERALD (SC) 2328 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dr. Arijit Pasayat The Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.K. Jain Criminal Appeal No. 963…

Cr P C

Power to Summon material witness—Object of—That there may not be failure of justice on account of mistake of either party in bringing the valuable evidence on record or leaving ambiguity in the statements of the witnesses examined from either side.

Apr 24, 2017 sclaw

2007(3) LAW HERALD (SC) 2305 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Arijit Pasayat The Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.K. Jain Criminal Appeal No. 934 of…

Cr P C

Inherent jurisdiction—It is neither possible nor desirable to lay down any inflexible rule which would govern the exercise of inherent jurisdiction. Charges have been framed, therefore question of quashing of FIR does not arise.

Apr 23, 2017 sclaw

2007(3) LAW HERALD (SC) 2272 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Arijit Pasayat, C.K. Thakker The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Lokeshwar Singh Panta Criminal Appeal…

Cr P C

First Information Report—Non recording of—The modalities to be adopted are as set out in Sections 190 read with Section 200 of the Code.

Apr 22, 2017 sclaw

2007(3) LAW HERALD (SC) 2269 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dr. Arijit Pasayat The Hon’ble Mr. Justice P.K. Balasubramanyan The Hon’ble Mr.…

Cr P C

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Sections 95, 96—Forfeiture of publication—Provisions are clearly preventive nature—Designed to pre-empt any disturbance in public order—Section 95 of the code does not by itself create a criminal offence.

Apr 20, 2017 sclaw

2007(3) LAW HERALD (SC) 1959 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice B.P. Singh The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Harjit Singh Bedi Criminal Appeal No. 1228…

Cr P C

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) – Section – 482, 397(2), 397 – Dismissal of petition – Appellant had moved the High Court of Delhi in a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC invoking its inherent jurisdiction – High Court failed to distinguish its separate powers under Section 397 of the CrPC as also under Section 482 of the said Code.

Apr 16, 2017 sclaw

(1998) 8 SCC 770 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA JITENDER KUMAR JAIN — Appellant Vs. STATE OF DELHI AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : M. M. Punchhi, J; K.…

Cr P C

Arraying other persons as accused—Such person even though had initially been named in the F.I.R. as an accused, but not charge sheeted, can also be added to face the trial

Apr 14, 2017 sclaw

2007(2) LAW HERALD (SC) 1710 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Arijit Pasayat The Hon’ble Mr. Justice P.K. Balasubramanyan The Honb’le Mr. Justiec D.K. Jain…

Cr P C

Rape–Compromise between parties–Offence not compoundable.

Apr 10, 2017 sclaw

2007(2) LAW HERALD (SC) 1373 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dr. Arijit Pasayat The Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.K. Jain Criminal Appeal No. 554…

Cr P C

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) – Sections 397 and 401 – Revision – Dismissal in absence of revisionist petitioner – Validity of – Counsel of petitioner had been appointed as counsel for State

Apr 9, 2017 sclaw

AIR 2007 SC 457 : (2007) CriLJ 309 : (2006) 11 SCALE 498 : (2006) 12 SCC 446 : (2006) 8 SCR 1172 Supp SUPREME COURT OF INDIA SATIN…

You missed

Consumer

Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 25 — Enforcement of orders — Pre-2002 amendment and post-2019 Act, all orders could be enforced as decrees. The period between 15.03.2003 to 20.07.2020 saw an anomaly where only interim orders (and monetary recovery) were clearly enforceable under Section 25, leaving final non-monetary orders in a gap. Interpretation of Statutes — Casus omissus — Court can fill gaps in legislation using interpretative tools like purposive construction when literal interpretation leads to absurdity or defeats the object of the Act, especially for remedial legislation like the Consumer Act.

Sep 2, 2025 sclaw

Service

Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 14, 39(d) and 43 — Equal pay for equal work — Contractual Assistant Professors performing identical duties as regularly appointed or ad-hoc Assistant Professors are entitled to the minimum pay scale of Assistant Professors.

Sep 2, 2025 sclaw

State Laws

Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 — Chapter I-A — Slum Rehabilitation Schemes — Preferential right of landowner to redevelop — Section 3B(4)(e) and Section 13(1) confer a preferential right on the landowner to redevelop a Slum Rehabilitation Area (SR Area) — SRA can undertake redevelopment only if the landowner fails to come forward with a scheme within a reasonable time

Sep 2, 2025 sclaw

State Laws

Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 — Sections 3C, 13, 14 — Waiver of preferential right — Waiver of landowner’s preferential right to redevelop requires clear and overt communication by the owner of intention not to exercise the right — Mere inaction or delay, particularly when the owner has consistently shown intent to redevelop, does not constitute waiver, especially if no invitation for redevelopment was issued.

Sep 2, 2025 sclaw

Category: Cr P C

You missed