Cr P C Archives - Page 21 of 51 - Supreme Court of India Judgements

May 8, 2025 4:05 am

Discharge application – Orders framing charges or refusing discharge are neither interlocutory nor final in nature and are therefore not affected by the bar of Section 397 (2) of CrPC

May 16, 2021 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH SANJAY KUMAR RAI — Appellant Vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : N.V. Ramana, CJI., Surya Kant and Aniruddha…

Cr P C

-Transfer of Criminal Case solely based on the fact that one of the parties to that case is unable to follow the language of that Court would not warrant exercise of jurisdiction of this Court under Section 406 of the 1973 Code

May 16, 2021 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA SINGLE BENCH RAJKUMAR SABU — Appellant Vs. M/S. SABU TRADE PRIVATE LIMITED — Respondent ( Before : Aniruddha Bose, J. ) Transfer Petition (Criminal) No. 17…

Cr P C

Orders framing charges or refusing discharge are neither interlocutory nor final in nature and are therefore not affected by the bar of Section 397 (2) of CrPC.HELD that the trial court while considering the discharge application is not to act as a mere post office.

May 8, 2021 sclaw

The correct position of law as laid down in Madhu Limaye (supra), thus, is that orders framing charges or refusing discharge are neither interlocutory nor final in nature and are…

Cr P C

According to the learned counsel for the co-accused, they are also aged and that they are also suffering from ill health – Therefore, they contend that a transfer from Darjeeling to New Delhi will make their life miserable – If the petitioner is entitled to a fair trial, the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are also equally entitled to a fair trial – Transfer dismissed.

Apr 25, 2021 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA SINGLE BENCH DEVENDRA KUMAR SAXENA — Appellant Vs. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (CBI) AND OTHER — Respondent ( Before : V. Ramasubramanian, J. ) Transfer Petition…

Cr P C

Mohd. Mukhtar Ansari case – It is a well settled principle of law that the Statute must be interpreted to advance the cause of the Statute and not to defeat the same – State Government being a prosecuting agency in the Criminal Administration, is vitally interested in such administration – Petition under section 406 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is maintainable.

Mar 29, 2021 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH — Appellant Vs. JAIL SUPERINTENDENT (ROPAR) AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Ashok Bhushan and R. Subhash Reddy, JJ.…

Cr P C

If on the basis of the examination-in-chief of the witness the Court is satisfied that there is a prima facie case against the proposed accused, the Court may in exercise of powers under Section 319 CrPC array such a person as accused and summon him to face the trial.

Mar 21, 2021 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH SARTAJ SINGH — Appellant Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ETC. — Respondent ( Before : Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud and M. R. Shah,…

Cr P C

(CrPC) – Section 117 – Putting person in fear of accusation of offence, in order to commit extortion – Transfer Petition – Place of inquiry and trial has to be by the Court within whose local jurisdiction – Cause of action as per the averments in the FIR are alleged to have arisen

Mar 14, 2021 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH SWAATI NIRKHI AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Ashok Bhushan and Indu Malhotra, JJ.…

Cr P C

Anticipatory Bail Once Granted Does Not Automatically End With Filing Of Chargesheet,

Mar 8, 2021 sclaw

it is held that the life or duration of an anticipatory bail order does not end normally at the time and stage when the accused is summoned by the court,…

Cr P C

(CrPC) – Section 311 – The significant expression that occurs is “at any stage of any inquiry or trial or other proceeding under this Code”. It is, however, to be borne in mind that the discretionary power conferred under Section 311 CrPC has to be exercised judiciously, as it is always said “wider the power, greater is the necessity of caution while exercise of judicious discretion.”

Mar 7, 2021 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH V.N. PATIL — Appellant Vs. K. NIRANJAN KUMAR AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Indu Malhotra and Ajay Rastogi, JJ. ) Criminal Appeal…

Cr P C

(CrPC) – Ss 320, 320(2) &320(5) – (IPC) – S 324 – Custodial Death – A case where the accused who were police officers, one of them being in-charge of Station and other Senior Inspector have themselves brutally beaten the deceased, who died the same night – Their offences cannot be compounded by the Court in exercise of Section 320(2) read with sub-section (5).

Feb 21, 2021 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH PRAVAT CHANDRA MOHANTY — Appellant Vs. THE STATE OF ODISHA AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : Ashok Bhushan and Ajay Rastogi, JJ. )…

You missed

Service

Under Rule 17, CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, prior contractual service counts towards pension upon subsequent regularisation, subject to the employee opting to refund/forgo specified monetary benefits.

May 6, 2025 sclaw

I B C

Service of an IBC Section 8 demand notice upon Key Managerial Personnel at the Corporate Debtor’s registered office constitutes valid service on the company, emphasizing substance over technical form.

May 6, 2025 sclaw

Cr P C

High Court’s inherent power to quash criminal proceedings precludes conducting a ‘mini trial’ by assessing evidence credibility; consistency requires acknowledging coordinate bench decisions involving co-accused.

May 5, 2025 sclaw

Cr P C

Quashing FIR under 482 CrPC impermissible when complaint prima facie discloses cognizable offences; allegations accepted true, investigation not thwarted based on delay, civil suit, or witness status if complicity alleged.

May 5, 2025 sclaw

Category: Cr P C

You missed