Bail Granted Archives - Page 12 of 14 - Supreme Court of India Judgements

March 26, 2026 6:58 am

LANDMARK JUDGEMENT — Bail—Default Bail—If offence is punishable with imprisonment upto 10 years’ then accused in entitled for default bail after 60 days and where minimum sentence is 10 years or more then after 90 days.

Oct 25, 2017 sclaw

2017(3) Law Herald (SC) 1745 : 2017 LawHerald.Org 1271 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDiA Before Hon’ble Mr. Justice Madan B. Lokur Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta Hon’ble Mr. Justice…

Bail Granted

Penal Code, 1860 – Section 498-A and 304-B -Offences of dowry death and cruelty – Pendency of appeal – Accused in jail for more than three years

Aug 20, 2017 sclaw

AIR 2000 SC 3404(1) : (2000) CriLJ 2452 : (2000) 1 JT 184 : (2000) 4 SCC 178 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA SHAILENDRA KUMAR — Appellant Vs. STATE OF…

Bail Granted

Bail—Economic Offence—Latest status report of further investigation does not indicate specific issues presently being pursued to impellingly justify detention—Bail granted. Bail—Grant of—Seriousness of the charge, is not the only test or the factor to grant or deny such privilege; is regulated to a large extent by the facts and circumstances of each particular case.

Jul 22, 2017 sclaw

2017(1) Law Herald (SC) 285 : 2017 LawHerald.Org 581 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Arun Mishra The Hon’ble Mi. Justice Amitava Roy Criminal Appeal…

Bail Granted

Bail—Stamp scam—Allegation of helping Telgi in jail—Long time to complete trial—Another person with similar allegation already on bail—Bail granted.

Jul 8, 2017 sclaw

2007(4) LAW HERALD (SC) 3309 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice K.G. Balakrishnan, C.J. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarun Chatterjee The Hon’ble Mr. Justice…

Bail Granted

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, S.482 & S.438-Quashing-lnherent Powers- Anticipatory Bail–S.438 CrPC has been deleted in State of Uttar Pradesh-Wherever the High Court finds that in a given case if the protection against pre-arrest is not given, it would amount to gross miscarriage of justice

Jul 8, 2017 sclaw

2017(1) Law Herald (SC) 238 : 2017 LawHerald.Org 516 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dipak Misra The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitava Roy Criminal Appeal…

Bail Granted

Consideration of material – Scope and necessity of – Though detailed examination of evidence and elaborate documentation of merits of case is to be avoided by Courts, yet a Court dealing with bail application should be satisfied as to whether there is a prima facie case, but exhaustive exploration of merits of case, not necessary

May 28, 2017 sclaw

AIR 2006 SC 3248 : (2006) CriLJ 4618 : (2006) 2 DMC 500 : (2006) 12 JT 55 : (2006) 9 SCALE 378 : (2006) 6 SCR 349 Supp…

Bail Granted

Activities of appellant fall under Section 24 of Maharashtra Control of Organised Crimes Act, 1999 for which maximum punishment is three years – Appellant has already been in prison for 2 years and 9 months – Having regard to nature of involvement alleged and role attributed to appellant in charge-sheet, it is a fit case for grant of bail to the appellant – Appellant directed to be released on bail.

May 28, 2017 sclaw

AIR 2006 SC 3403 : (2006) 12 JT 508 : (2006) 9 SCALE 384 : (2006) AIRSCW 5151 : (2006) 7 Supreme 533 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA MOHAMMAD CHAND MULANI…

Bail Granted

However, when there are other surrounding circumstances which reveal that there were doubts about origin of accounts and monies deposited therein, same principles would not apply – Respondent had not been able to establish that same were neither proceeds of crime nor untainted property – Bail cancelled.

May 13, 2017 sclaw

(2012) CriLJ 630 : (2011) 4 RCR(Criminal) 427 : (2011) 11 SCALE 302 : (2011) 109 SCL 615 : (2011) 11 SCR 778 : (2011) 6 UJ 4268 SUPREME COURT…

Bail Granted

Bail—Grant of—Factors to be considered; enumerated.

May 7, 2017 sclaw

2007(3) LAW HERALD (SC) 2613 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dr. Arijit Pasayat The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Altamas Kabir Criminal Appeal No. 1122…

Bail Granted

However, appellant No. 2 is an 80 years old lady and suffering from various age related ailments – It does not seem fair to hold her back in jail during pendency of appeal even if she had been convicted for alleged serious offence – Bail granted to appellant No. 2.

May 7, 2017 sclaw

(2009) 6 JT 431 : (2009) 7 SCALE 231 : (2009) 6 SCC 561 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA BAKSHISH RAM AND ANOTHER — Appellant Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB —…

You missed

Arbitration

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 34, Section 37 — Challenge to arbitral award — Jurisdiction of arbitrator — Clause in a contract that states one party’s decision is final and cannot be challenged in any court or arbitration is void if it seeks to prevent adjudication on disputed liability, as the determination of breach and liability rests with an adjudicatory forum, not the party alleging breach.

Mar 24, 2026 sclaw

I B C

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) — Section 12A — Withdrawal of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) — Commercial Wisdom of Committee of Creditors (CoC) — Primacy of CoC’s commercial wisdom in deciding withdrawal of CIRP is non-justiciable and not subject to appeal or review by adjudicating authorities, except on grounds of statutory illegality or jurisdictional infirmity — Supreme Court in a miscellaneous application concerning a disposed SLP from a civil revision cannot adjudicate rival offers or substitute its view for the CoC’s business decision.

Mar 24, 2026 sclaw

Service

Karnataka Recruitment of Gazetted Probationers (Appointment by Competitive Examinations) Rules, 1997 — Rule 11(1), 11(3) & Rule 4(3) — Selection process for Gazetted Probationers — Vacancy arising from non-joining candidate — Claims of next eligible candidate — Held, select list is not an open-ended reservoir of candidates but is prepared for notified vacancies & operates within statutory framework — Inclusion in select list does not confer indefeasible right to appointment — Appointment governed by Rules & notified vacancies — No provision for reserve/waiting list under 1997 Rules — Post left unfilled due to non-completion of pre-appointment formalities or non-joining cannot be filled by operating the same select list & claiming by next candidate in absence of express statutory provision — High Court erred in allowing writ petition & setting aside Tribunal’s order.

Mar 24, 2026 sclaw

Constitution

Constitution of India, 1950 — Articles 14, 15(1), 16, 309 — Relaxation in qualifying examination (TET) marks for reserved category candidates — The provision of relaxation in qualifying marks in TET enables reserved category candidates to enter the zone of consideration and does not affect their inter se merit in the main selection process (TAIT) — Migration to the open category is permissible if recruitment rules do not expressly prohibit it or are silent on the matter — Decisions in Pradeep Kumar and Sajib Roy are distinguishable as they dealt with candidates not fulfilling essential eligibility criteria, unlike in this case where relaxation in TET marks is expressly permitted by NCTE guidelines — The High Court erred in not allowing meritorious reserved category candidates to be considered under the general category — Appeals allowed, impugned judgment set aside.

Mar 24, 2026 sclaw

Category: Bail Granted

You missed