This content is restricted to site members. If you are an existing user, please log in. New users may register below.Existing Users Log InUsername or EmailPassword Remember Me Forgot password? Click here to resetNew User? Click here to register Post navigation Evidence Act, 1872 — Section 32 — Two dying Declarations, one oral and one written, with several discrepancies cannot convict the accused — Oral dying declaration allegedly made by deceased before her father, uncle and grand — mother, in which names of accused mentioned. However second dying declaration recorded by Magistrate five days later stated that the victim could not recognize any accused because of fire Criminal Jurisprudence—Proof beyond reasonable doubt is a guideline, not a obsession. FIR—Prompt lodging—Acquittal—Fact that the FIR was lodged very soon therefore there was no time to concoct a false story—Not always acceptable.