This content is restricted to site members. If you are an existing user, please log in. New users may register below.Existing Users Log InUsername or EmailPassword Remember Me Forgot password? Click here to resetNew User? Click here to register Post navigation Ancestral Property–Alienation–Legal necessity–Once it is found that the conveyance executed by karta & others is true under which the plaintiffs were put in possession and later on disposed, in such event, in suit of possession, the issue of legal necessity becomes irrelevant. Joint Hindu Property—Partition—Even separate possession of portion of the property by the co-sharers itself would not lead to a presumption of partition. First Appeal—The appellate court, if it seeks to reverse those findings of fact, must give cogent reasons to demonstrate how the trial court fell into an obvious error.