Temporary Employee should be given equal Salary as Regular Employee
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before:- Jagdish Singh Khehar and S.A. Bobde, JJ. Civil Appeal No. 213 Of 2013. D/d. 26.10.2016. State of Punjab & Ors. – Appellants Versus Jagjit Singh…
Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Service (Classification, Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1975 – Rule 13 – Probation – Departmental examination – Matter referred to High Court consider the effect of non-consideration of Rule 13 of 1975 Rules on the earlier occasion as well as the impact of the decisions of this Court
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH WARAD MURTI MISHRA — Appellant Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANOTHER. — Respondent ( Before : Uday Umesh Lalit and Indu Malhotra,…
Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 32 and 142 – Appointment – Post of Police Sub-Inspector – Selection and appointment of the 133 candidates are passed in the peculiar background of the litigation starting from the advertisement in the year 2004 and several rounds of litigations during the past fourteen years, in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 142 of the Constitution of India and the same shall not be treated as a precedent.
Docid # IndLawLib/1467956 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH NIRBHAY KUMAR AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Ashok Bhushan, M.R. Shah…
Bihar Service Code – Rule 73 – Compulsory retirement – Rule 73 of the Bihar Service Code does not prescribe any length of service as criteria for retirement. The prescribed age of retirement for employees of the category to which the Appellant belonged was 58 years, later increased to 60 years. The decision of the respondents to retire the Appellant before he attained the age of 60 years as per his actual date of birth. Matter referred to CJI as difference of opinion..
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH GOPAL PRASAD — Appellant Vs. BIHAR SCHOOL EXAMINATION BOARD AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Indira Banerjee and Ajay Rastogi, JJ. )…
Conduct, Discipline and Appeal Rules, 1978 – Rule 34.3 – Payment of gratuity – Employer has a right to withhold gratuity during pendency of the disciplinary proceedings. HELD termination’ and ‘dismissal’ are held to be synonymous but the difference between ‘termination’ and ‘dismissal’ is that dismissal could be on account of misconduct with loss of future employment involving dishonesty or criminality and penal in character but that is not in the case of termination – The “termination” as per Black’s Law Dictionary is the complete severance of relationship of employer and employee which in the instant case could be saved during pendency of the disciplinary proceedings
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH CHAIRMAN-CUM-MANAGING DIRECTOR, MAHANADI COALFIELDS LIMITED — Appellant Vs. SRI RABINDRANATH CHOUBEY — Respondent ( Before : Arun Mishra, M.R. Shah and Ajay Rastogi,…
Employee Can Be Dismissed In Disciplinary Inquiry Completed After Retirement If Rules Permit It: SC Holds By 2:1 Majority
Employee Can Be Dismissed In Disciplinary Inquiry Completed After Retirement If Rules Permit It: SC Holds By 2:1 Majority Ashok Kini 28 May 2020 10:26 AM The Supreme Court [2:1]…
[Public Service Recruitment] Judicial Review Should Be Rarely Exercised If Provision For Revaluation Of Answer Sheets Is Absent: SC
[Public Service Recruitment] Judicial Review Should Be Rarely Exercised If Provision For Revaluation Of Answer Sheets Is Absent: SC [Read Judgment] LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK 10 May 2020 1:17 PM “The…
Constitution of India, 1950 – Articles 142 and 226 – Service Law – Recruitment – BSSC is directed to evaluate and publish the results afresh, in the light of the recommendations and report of the experts (constituted by this court) subject to care being taken by the BSSC and the Govt. of Bihar, not to disturb appointments made previously pursuant to the directions of the single judge
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH BIHAR STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. ARUN KUMAR AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Rohinton Fali Nariman and S.…
Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 – Sections 4(2), 4(3), 4(5) and 7 – Calculation of amount of gratuity – In case of such an employee the gratuity has to be calculated in accordance with the provisions of the Act and while so calculating, not only the basic principle available in Section 4(2) as to how the gratuity is to be calculated must be applied but also the ceiling which is part of Section 4(3) must also apply . Decided on : 29-04-2020
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH BCH ELECTRIC LIMITED — Appellant Vs. PRADEEP MEHRA — Respondent ( Before : Uday Umesh Lalit and Sanjiv Khanna, JJ. ) Civil Appeal…
Service As Additional Judge On Ad-Hoc Promotion Will Not Count For Seniority Of District Judge : SC HELD The reckonable date has to be the date when substantive appointment is made and not from the date of the initial ad-hoc appointment or promotion, Court held. D/April 29, 2020.
Service As Additional Judge On Ad-Hoc Promotion Will Not Count For Seniority Of District Judge : SC [Read Judgment] LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK 29 April 2020 7:54 PM The reckonable date…