Land Acquisition Archives - Page 20 of 25 - Supreme Court of India Judgements

Land Acquisition Act, 1894, S.I8—Market Value—Fruit bearing trees–Appellants submitted that since the holding is very small and since the people have been dependent and the income from the fruit bearing trees they would go by the calculation on the basis of income from fruit bearing trees only and not on basis of land value–Ordered accordingly

Jul 8, 2018 sclaw

(2017) 4 LawHerald(SC) 2880 : (2018) 2 Scale 338 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH ISMAIL HUSHEN GHANCHI — Appellant Vs. NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA — Respondent ( Before : Kurian Joseph and…

Land Acquisition

Land Acquisition—Market Value—It is neither permissible and nor proper to rely solely upon the rates of small plots and then determine the compensation for a large chunk of acquired land.

Jun 30, 2018 sclaw

(2018) 181 AIC 171 : (2017) AIR(SCW) 5811 : (2017) AIR(SC) 5811 : (2018) 126 ALR 490 : (2018) 1 ApexCourtJudgments(SC) 60 : (2018) 1 JCR 204 : (2017) 4LawHerald(SC) 2755 : (2018)…

Land Acquisition

Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, S.24—Lapsing of Proceedings—Non-acceptance of compensation—Whether deposit of compensation amount with treasury is valid tender—Whether interest is payable on amount deposited in treasury—Whether non acceptance of compensation by land owners would result in lapse of proceedings—Matter referred to larger bench.

Jun 15, 2018 sclaw

(2018) 1 AllWC 372 : (2018) 1 BCR 1 : (2017) DNJ 1120 : (2018) 1 KarLR 151 : (2017) 4 LawHerald(SC) 2954 : (2018) 1 RCR(Civil) 431 : (2017) 6 RecentApexJudgments(RAJ) 440 :…

Land Acquisition

Land Acquisition—Lapsing of Proceedings—In section 24(2) of the Act of 2013 in the expression ‘paid’ it is not necessary that the amount should be deposited in court as provided in section 31 (2) of the Act of 1894—Deposit in treasury is a valid tender.

Jun 12, 2018 sclaw

(2018) AIR(SCW) 824 : (2018) AIR(SC) 824 : (2018) 1 LawHerald(SC) 383 : (2018) 2 Scale 1 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY — Appellant Vs. SHAILENDRA (DEAD)THROUGH LRS. — Respondent…

Land Acquisition

Land Acquisition–Redetermination of Compensation—When the award, based on which enhancement, is already pending appeal, then till the disposal of appeal, application u/s 28-A is to be kept pending.

May 25, 2018 sclaw

(2017) AIR(SCW) 5741 : (2018) 1 AIRBomR 728 : (2017) AIR(SC) 5741 : (2018) 1 ALT 11 : (2017) DNJ 1105 : (2017) 12 JT 197 : (2018) 1 LawHerald(SC) 44 : (2018) 1…

Land Acquisition

Land Acquisition—Post notification sale instances—They cannot be taken into consideration even if they are few days later from date of notification.

May 5, 2018 sclaw

(2018) AIR(SCW) 645 : (2018) AIR(SC) 645 : (2018) 1 JT 495 : (2018) 1 LawHerald(SC) 280 : (2018) 1 MPWN 217 : (2018) 1 RCR(Civil) 870 : (2018) 1 Scale 501 : (2018)…

Land Acquisition

Land Acquisition— Refund of Court Fee—While remanding the cases for fresh adjudication on merits Supreme Court directed that landowners (applicants) are entitled to get back the amount of court fee paid by each appellant (land owner) on his appeal memo.

Apr 30, 2018 sclaw

(2018) AIR(SCW) 1013 : (2018) AIR(SC) 1013 : (2018) 2 JT 112 : (2018) 1 LAR 198 : (2018) 1 LawHerald(SC) 253 : (2018) 1 RCR(Civil) 990 : (2018) 1 Scale 551 SUPREME COURT…

Land Acquisition

Land Acquisition—Compensation—More than claimed can be awarded by court to award just and fair compensation.

Apr 22, 2018 sclaw

(2016) 161 AIC 139 : (2016) AIR(SCW) 1210 : (2016) 2 AIRJharR 144 : (2016) AIR(SC) 1210 : (2016) AllSCR 778 : (2016) 116 ALR 471 : (2016) 3 AndhLD…

Land Acquisition

Land Acquisition—Fruit Bearing trees—Pomegranate Tree—Rs. 3,000/-a warded as compensation for each pomegranate tree where notification u/s 4 was of 1999 and Rs. 2,000/- where notification u/s 4 was of 1992.

Apr 2, 2018 sclaw

(2018) 181 AIC 118 : (2018) 126 ALR 480 : (2017) 3 ApexCourtJudgments(SC) 461 : (2017) 3 LawHerald(SC) 2450 : (2017) 2 MadWN(Civil) 676 : (2017) 6 MLJ 125 : (2017) 4 RCR(Civil)…

Land Acquisition

Land Acquisition—Acquisition of the building can be made without acquiring land underneath to such building.

Mar 18, 2018 sclaw

(2017) AIR(SCW) 4490 : (2017) 6 AIRBomR 384 : (2017) AIR(SC) 4490 : (2017) 5 AllWC 5106 : (2017) 5 ALT 49 : (2017) 124 CutLT 833 : (2017)…

Land Acquisition—Market Value—It is neither permissible and nor proper to rely solely upon the rates of small plots and then determine the compensation for a large chunk of acquired land.

Land Acquisition—Lapsing of Proceedings—In section 24(2) of the Act of 2013 in the expression ‘paid’ it is not necessary that the amount should be deposited in court as provided in section 31 (2) of the Act of 1894—Deposit in treasury is a valid tender.

Land Acquisition–Redetermination of Compensation—When the award, based on which enhancement, is already pending appeal, then till the disposal of appeal, application u/s 28-A is to be kept pending.

Land Acquisition—Post notification sale instances—They cannot be taken into consideration even if they are few days later from date of notification.

Land Acquisition— Refund of Court Fee—While remanding the cases for fresh adjudication on merits Supreme Court directed that landowners (applicants) are entitled to get back the amount of court fee paid by each appellant (land owner) on his appeal memo.

Land Acquisition—Compensation—More than claimed can be awarded by court to award just and fair compensation.

Land Acquisition—Fruit Bearing trees—Pomegranate Tree—Rs. 3,000/-a warded as compensation for each pomegranate tree where notification u/s 4 was of 1999 and Rs. 2,000/- where notification u/s 4 was of 1992.

Land Acquisition—Acquisition of the building can be made without acquiring land underneath to such building.

You missed

Under Rule 17, CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, prior contractual service counts towards pension upon subsequent regularisation, subject to the employee opting to refund/forgo specified monetary benefits.

Service of an IBC Section 8 demand notice upon Key Managerial Personnel at the Corporate Debtor’s registered office constitutes valid service on the company, emphasizing substance over technical form.

High Court’s inherent power to quash criminal proceedings precludes conducting a ‘mini trial’ by assessing evidence credibility; consistency requires acknowledging coordinate bench decisions involving co-accused.

Quashing FIR under 482 CrPC impermissible when complaint prima facie discloses cognizable offences; allegations accepted true, investigation not thwarted based on delay, civil suit, or witness status if complicity alleged.

Supreme Court of India Judgements

Category: Land Acquisition

You missed