C P C Archives - Page 7 of 53 - Supreme Court of India Judgements

October 27, 2025 3:17 pm

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) – Section 100 – Second Appeal – Substantial questions of law – In appeals arising out of the state of Punjab or the State of Haryana, courts are not required to frame substantial questions of law as per section 100 of CPC.

Jul 28, 2023 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH GURBACHAN SINGH (DEAD) THROUGH LRS — Appellant Vs. GURCHARAN SINGH (DEAD) THROUGH LRS AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Abhay S. Oka and…

C P C

An error which is not self-evident and has to be detected by a process of reasoning, can hardly be said to be an error apparent on the face of the record justifying the Court to exercise its power of review

Jul 18, 2023 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH ARUN DEV UPADHYAYA — Appellant Vs. INTEGRATED SALES SERVICE LTD. AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : B.R. Gavai and Vikram Nath, JJ. )…

C P C

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) – Order 41 Rule 22 – Cross-Objections – In circumstance wherein the cross objections filed by the appellant therein was not considered by the court of first appeal, matter must be remanded to the High Court.

Jul 18, 2023 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH DHEERAJ SINGH AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Krishna Murari and Bela M.…

C P C

Right to repurchase in sale deed – Condition of right to repurchase in sale deed will not be personal to the vendor unless the terms in the documents specifically state so – Such a right can always be assigned and the contract containing such condition shall be enforceable.

Jul 18, 2023 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH INDIRA DEVI — Appellant Vs. VEENA GUPTA AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Abhay S. Oka and Rajesh Bindal, JJ. ) Civil Appeal…

C P C

An error on the face of record must be such an error which, mere looking at the record should strike and it should not require any long-drawn process of reasoning

Jul 16, 2023 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH ARUN DEV UPADHYAYA — Appellant Vs. INTEGRATED SALES SERVICE LTD. AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : B.R. Gavai and Vikram Nath, JJ. )…

C P C

Suit for partition – A simple suit for partition cannot be binding on third parties – No party to a suit for partition, even by way of compromise, can acquire any title to any specific item of property or any particular portion of a specific property, if such a compromise is struck only with a few parties to the suit.

Jul 11, 2023 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH M/S TRINITY INFRAVENTURES LTD. & ORS. ETC. — Appellant Vs. M.S. MURTHY & ORS. ETC. — Respondent ( Before : V. Ramasubramanian and Pankaj…

C P C

Review Petition – There was a total delay of 868 days in preferring the petition for review of order – No explanation for long delay in filing – Review Petition dismissed.

Jul 3, 2023 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER — Appellant Vs. DEVIKA KALPESHKUMAR CHAUHAN — Respondent ( Before : B.V. Nagarathna and Manoj Misra, JJ. ) Civil…

C P C

A simple suit for partition cannot be binding on third parties – No party to a suit for partition, even by way of compromise, can acquire any title to any specific item of property or any particular portion of a specific property, if such a compromise is struck only with a few parties to the suit – Allegations of fraud require special pleadings in terms of Order 6 Rule 4 CPC.

Jun 20, 2023 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH M/S TRINITY INFRAVENTURES LTD. & ORS. ETC. — Appellant Vs. M.S. MURTHY & ORS. ETC. — Respondent ( Before : V. Ramasubramanian and Pankaj…

C P C

Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 – Section 17 – Security furnished in the form of the rented shop belonging to a third party cannot be accepted as security in law

May 31, 2023 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH ARTI DIXIT AND ANOTHER — Appellant Vs. SUSHIL KUMAR MISHRA AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : K.M. Joseph and Hrishikesh Roy, JJ. )…

C P C

1924 Sale Deed, 1967 Eviction Suit and 1978 Mutation Proceedings – that ownership rights in respect of an immovable property cannot be decided casually. We are actually left with no other option but to remand these appeals back to the High Court for effective adjudication on merits.

May 28, 2023 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ANOTHER — Appellant Vs. RAVI KUMAR (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : Surya Kant and J.K.…

You missed

Transfer Of Property Act

Transfer of Property Act, 1882 — Sections 54, 55 — Agreement to Sell vs. Sale Deed — An agreement to sell by itself does not create any interest or charge on the property. Ownership passes only upon execution of a conveyance (sale deed). An agreement to sell, even with possession, is not a conveyance and does not confer title or transfer interest, except for the limited right under Section 53-A for protection against the transferor.

Oct 26, 2025 sclaw

Bail Granted Cr P C

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Suspension of Sentence — Bail Pending Appeal — Appellant incarcerated for over seven and a half years, appeal pending before High Court for years — Sufficient grounds exist for suspension of sentence and release on bail during appeal pendency — Order of High Court declining to suspend sentence set aside

Oct 26, 2025 sclaw

Anticipatory Bail Bail Granted

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — Sections 298, 299, 296, 115(2), 351(2) & Chhattisgarh Religion Act, 1968 — Section 4 — Bail in anticipation of arrest — Appellant joined investigation as directed by the court — High Court rejected bail application — Supreme Court considered materials on record and found appeal deserving acceptance — Appellant admitted to bail in anticipation of arrest.

Oct 26, 2025 sclaw

Bail Granted

Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 394, 395, and 397 — Robbery and Attempt to Commit Robbery — Conviction and Sentencing — Appeal for suspension of sentence and bail — Appellants convicted by Trial Court for offences under Sections 394, 395, and 397 IPC. High Court confirmed conviction under Section 397 IPC and modified sentence to 8 years rigorous imprisonment, while holding no separate conviction for Sections 394 and 395 IPC.

Oct 26, 2025 sclaw

Category: C P C

You missed