Limitation Archives - Page 6 of 10 - Supreme Court of India Judgements

May 7, 2025 1:49 am

The highest Court of the land cannot be a walk in place, the Supreme Court remarked while dismissing a Special Leave Petition filed by Jammu Municipality on the ground of inordinate delay.

Jan 27, 2020 sclaw

Highest Court Of The Land Cannot Be A Walk In Place, Says Supreme Court [Read Order] LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK 26 Jan 2020 8:56 PM The highest Court of the land…

Limitation

Adverse possession – A plea of adverse possession is founded on the acceptance that ownership of the property vests in another, against whom the claimant asserts possession adverse to the title of the other.

Jan 15, 2020 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH SHRI UTTAM CHAND (D) THROUGH LRS. — Appellant Vs. NATHU RAM (D) THROUGH LRS. AND OTHERS — Respondent ( Before : L. Nageswara Rao…

Limitation

Routine Explanation Not Enough For Condonation Of Delay: SC HELD”A reasonable and acceptable explanation is very much necessary.”

Dec 23, 2019 sclaw

Routine Explanation Not Enough For Condonation Of Delay: SC LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK 22 Dec 2019 2:48 PM “A reasonable and acceptable explanation is very much necessary.” The Supreme Court has…

Limitation

Delay of More Than 120 Days In Filing Arbitration Appeal Not Liable To Be Condoned

Dec 17, 2019 sclaw

Delay of More Than 120 Days In Filing Arbitration Appeal Not Liable To Be Condoned: SC [Read Judgment] Ashok Kini 15 Dec 2019 7:23 PM The Supreme Court has observed…

Limitation

Power To Condone Delay Under Sec 5 Limitation Act Applies To Special Or Local Laws If It Is Not Expressly Excluded : SC

Oct 28, 2019 sclaw

The Supreme Court has reiterated that the power to condone delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act is applicable to proceedings under special or local laws if it is…

Limitation

Companies Act, 1956 – Sections 433, 434, 433(e) and 434(1)(c) – Winding up Petition – Trigger of limitation – A winding up proceeding is a proceeding ‘in rem’ and not a recovery proceeding, the trigger of limitation, so far as the winding up petition is concerned, would be the date of default.

Sep 29, 2019 sclaw

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH JIGNESH SHAH AND ANOTHER — Appellant Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : R.F. Nariman, R. Subhash Reddy and Surya…

Limitation

Date Of Default Alone Is Relevant For Triggering Limitation For Winding Up Petition: SC Dismisses IL& F S Petition Against La-Fin – Art 137 Limitation applies to such disputes

Sep 26, 2019 sclaw

Date Of Default Alone Is Relevant For Triggering Limitation For Winding Up Petition: SC Dismisses IL& F S Petition Against La-Fin – Art 137 Limitation applies to such disputes IN…

Limitation

Limitation Act is applicable to applications filed under Sections 7 and 9 of the (IBC) Code from the inception of the Code, Article 137 of the Limitation Act gets attracted. “The right to sue”, therefore, accrues when a default occurs.

Sep 12, 2019 sclaw

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.23988 OF 2017 B.K. EDUCATIONAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED …APPELLANT VERSUS PARAG GUPTA AND ASSOCIATES …RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPEAL…

Limitation

IMP:: Does Adverse Possession also give right to sue for title? Supreme Court says YES

Aug 8, 2019 sclaw

Does Adverse Possession also give right to sue for title? Supreme Court says YES Shruti Mahajan August 7 2019 A person who has “perfected title” over an immovable property through adverse possession can maintain a suit under…

Limitation

V IMP::::Limitation—Applicability of Act—Suits, appeals and applications referred to in the Limitation Act are those which are to be filled in a Court and not before a Statutory authority

Jul 6, 2019 sclaw

2019(2) Law Herald (SC) 1592 : 2019 LawHerald.Org 1017 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan Hon’ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph Civil Appeal No. 4582…

You missed

Service

Under Rule 17, CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, prior contractual service counts towards pension upon subsequent regularisation, subject to the employee opting to refund/forgo specified monetary benefits.

May 6, 2025 sclaw

I B C

Service of an IBC Section 8 demand notice upon Key Managerial Personnel at the Corporate Debtor’s registered office constitutes valid service on the company, emphasizing substance over technical form.

May 6, 2025 sclaw

Cr P C

High Court’s inherent power to quash criminal proceedings precludes conducting a ‘mini trial’ by assessing evidence credibility; consistency requires acknowledging coordinate bench decisions involving co-accused.

May 5, 2025 sclaw

Cr P C

Quashing FIR under 482 CrPC impermissible when complaint prima facie discloses cognizable offences; allegations accepted true, investigation not thwarted based on delay, civil suit, or witness status if complicity alleged.

May 5, 2025 sclaw

Category: Limitation

You missed