<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--generator='jetpack-15.9'-->
<!--Jetpack_Sitemap_Buffer_News_XMLWriter-->
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="//sclaw.in/news-sitemap.xsl"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd">
 <url>
  <loc>https://sclaw.in/2026/06/23/constitution-of-india-1950-article-191d-article-21-fundamental-right-to-walk-the-right-to-walk-is-a-fundamental-right-integral-to-the-right-to-movement-under-articl/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-06-23T05:11:39Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Supreme Court of India  Judgements  </news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 19(1)(d), Article 21 — Fundamental Right to Walk — The right to walk is a fundamental right integral to the right to movement under Article 19(1)(d), read with other provisions of Article 19 and Article 21 — This fundamental right includes the right to demarcated footpaths, which must take precedence over the movement of motorised vehicles</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-06-23T05:11:39Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://sclaw.in/2026/06/23/civil-procedure-code-1908-cpc-order-21-execution-proceedings-high-courts-directions-for-assessment-of-compensation-in-execution-proceedings-held-impermiss/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-06-23T05:07:32Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Supreme Court of India  Judgements  </news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 21 — Execution proceedings — High Court&amp;#039;s directions for assessment of compensation in execution proceedings — Held, impermissible when original suit did not seek compensation and parties did not consent — Setting aside of trial court and first appellate court decrees, followed by direction to execute court to assess value of construction, is not supported by CPC</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-06-23T05:07:32Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
</urlset>
