https://sclaw.in/2026/04/30/right-to-education-act-2009-section-12-uttar-pradesh-right-of-children-to-free-and-compulsory-education-rules-2011-rule-8-neighbourhood-school-obligation/ 2026-04-30T14:57:56Z Supreme Court of India Judgements en Right to Education Act, 2009 — Section 12 — Uttar Pradesh Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Rules, 2011 — Rule 8 — Neighbourhood School Obligation — A neighbourhood school has a constitutional and statutory duty to admit students forwarded by the State Government without delay, as mandated by Article 21A of the Constitution and relevant provisions of the RTE Act and UP RTE Rules — The school cannot question the eligibility of a student once the government has completed the admission process and forwarded the list. 2026-04-30T14:57:56Z Blog https://sclaw.in/2026/04/30/insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016-section-58-financial-debt-corporate-guarantees-a-liability-arising-from-corporate-guarantee-for-money-borrowed-against-in/ 2026-04-30T14:55:07Z Supreme Court of India Judgements en Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 — Section 5(8) — Financial Debt — Corporate Guarantees — A liability arising from corporate guarantee for money borrowed against interest qualifies as financial debt — The execution of corporate guarantees, even if challenged on grounds of timing or non-disclosure, are considered valid and enforceable if their execution is admitted or demonstrably proven, making the appellants entitled to recognition as financial creditors. 2026-04-30T14:55:07Z Blog https://sclaw.in/2026/04/30/civil-services-tenure-curtailment-not-punitive-unless-stigmatic-curtailment-of-tenure-and-reversion-to-a-lower-post-is-not-punitive-or-stigmatic-merely-because-it-is-prem/ 2026-04-30T14:51:38Z Supreme Court of India Judgements en Civil Services — Tenure Curtailment — Not Punitive Unless Stigmatic — Curtailment of tenure and reversion to a lower post is not punitive or stigmatic merely because it is premature or based on unsatisfactory performance reports, as long as the order itself does not impute misconduct or stigma beyond unsuitability for the role. 2026-04-30T14:51:38Z Blog https://sclaw.in/2026/04/30/insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016-ibc-section-7-application-under-limitation-period-calculation-default-date-right-to-file-application/ 2026-04-30T14:43:15Z Supreme Court of India Judgements en Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) — Section 7 — Application under — Limitation period — Calculation — Default date — Right to file application under Section 7 of IBC accrues on the date of default, which is when the corporate debtor first fails to discharge its repayment obligations — Limitation begins to run from the date of classification of the account as Non — Performing Asset (NPA) — Application filed beyond the prescribed period of limitation, even after considering extensions due to CIRP and Covid — 19 pandemic, is barred by limitation — NCLT and NCLAT orders admitting the application are quashed and set aside. 2026-04-30T14:43:15Z Blog https://sclaw.in/2026/04/30/service-law-regularisation-of-service-daily-wage-employees-the-supreme-court-held-that-a-scheme-formulated-by-the-respondents-which-contemplated-engagement-on-a-temporar/ 2026-04-30T14:40:03Z Supreme Court of India Judgements en Service Law — Regularisation of Service — Daily Wage Employees — The Supreme Court held that a scheme formulated by the respondents, which contemplated engagement on a temporary basis, was at variance with the Tribunal's directions for engagement on a permanent footing — The Court set aside the scheme and directed the regularisation of services for the appellants with permanent status. 2026-04-30T14:40:03Z Blog https://sclaw.in/2026/04/30/criminal-procedure-code-1973-crpc-registration-of-fir-mandatory-upon-disclosure-of-cognizable-offence-lalita-kumari-v-govt-of-u-p-no-preliminary-inquiry-generally/ 2026-04-30T14:34:52Z Supreme Court of India Judgements en Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Registration of FIR — Mandatory upon disclosure of cognizable offence (Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of U.P.) — No preliminary inquiry generally permissible — Remedies for non — registration under Section 154(3) and 156(3) are efficacious.- Magistrate's power to direct FIR registration and investigation is pre-cognizance — Sanction under Sections 196 & 197 CrPC operates at cognizance stage, not investigation stage. 2026-04-30T14:34:52Z Blog