<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--generator='jetpack-15.8'-->
<!--Jetpack_Sitemap_Buffer_News_XMLWriter-->
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="//sclaw.in/news-sitemap.xsl"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd">
 <url>
  <loc>https://sclaw.in/2026/05/14/income-tax-act-1961-section-147-and-148-reopening-of-assessment-validity-tangible-material-change-of-opinion-assessing-officer-has-no-power/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-05-14T14:17:59Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Supreme Court of India  Judgements  </news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>Income Tax Act, 1961 — Section 147 and 148 — Reopening of assessment — Validity — Tangible material — Change of opinion — Assessing Officer has no power to review an assessment; reassessment must be based on tangible material, not a mere change of opinion — The discovery of fresh information during a survey, which reveals the true nature of a transaction and suggests income has escaped assessment, can form the basis for reopening an assessment, even if certain disclosures were made during the original assessment.</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-05-14T14:17:59Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://sclaw.in/2026/05/14/wifes-pursuit-of-professional-career-and-desire-to-provide-safe-environment-for-child-are-not-grounds-for-cruelty-or-desertion-family-law-divorce-grounds-cruelty-and/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-05-14T14:15:02Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Supreme Court of India  Judgements  </news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>Wife&amp;#039;s pursuit of professional career and desire to provide safe environment for child are not grounds for cruelty or desertion.  -Family Law — Divorce — Grounds — Cruelty and Desertion — Wife&amp;#039;s pursuit of professional career and desire to provide safe environment for child are not grounds for cruelty or desertion.</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-05-14T14:15:02Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://sclaw.in/2026/05/14/constitution-of-india-1950-article-191a-and-article-21a-right-to-education-medium-of-instruction-freedom-of-speech-and-expression-includes-the-right-to-rec/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-05-14T14:11:38Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Supreme Court of India  Judgements  </news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 19(1)(a) and Article 21A — Right to education — Medium of instruction — Freedom of speech and expression includes the right to receive information in a comprehensible manner — Education must be imparted in a language that the child understands best — Right to primary education in a language of choice is part of freedom of speech and expression — State cannot impose controls on such choice.</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-05-14T14:11:38Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://sclaw.in/2026/05/14/motor-vehicles-act-1988-compensation-enhancement-deceased-was-an-engineering-student-with-good-academic-record-and-potential-future-earnings-high-court-enhance/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-05-14T14:08:57Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Supreme Court of India  Judgements  </news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Compensation — Enhancement — Deceased was an engineering student with good academic record and potential future earnings — High Court enhanced compensation but it was found to be on the lower side — The Supreme Court assessed the monthly income at Rs. 12,000/-, added 40% for future prospects, deducted half for personal expenses, and applied a multiplier of 18 — Compensation under conventional heads was also enhanced — The motorcycle damage was awarded as per the surveyor&amp;#039;s report.</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-05-14T14:08:57Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://sclaw.in/2026/05/14/canara-bank-officer-employees-discipline-and-appeal-regulations-1976-regulation-10-common-proceedings-the-word-may-in-regulation-10-which-empowers-the/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-05-14T14:06:41Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Supreme Court of India  Judgements  </news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>. Canara Bank Officer Employees’ (Discipline and Appeal) Regulations, 1976 — Regulation 10 — Common Proceedings — The word &amp;quot;may&amp;quot; in Regulation 10, which empowers the competent authority to direct common disciplinary proceedings against multiple employees, is directory and not mandatory — This interpretation allows for discretion to be exercised by the employer based on the circumstances and the varying roles of the employees involved — The failure to hold a joint inquiry does not automatically vitiate individual disciplinary proceedings.</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-05-14T14:06:41Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://sclaw.in/2026/05/14/insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016-section-61-appeal-against-nclt-order-requirement-of-certified-copy-of-impugned-order-rules-for-filing-appeal-before-nclat/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-05-14T14:03:28Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Supreme Court of India  Judgements  </news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 — Section 61 — Appeal against NCLT order — Requirement of certified copy of impugned order — Rules for filing appeal before NCLAT — Presentation of appeals under Rule 22 of NCLAT Rules, 2016 — Appeal must be accompanied by a certified copy of impugned order — Applying for certified copy before expiry of limitation period is crucial for excluding time taken to procure it — Failure to file certified copy or obtain exemption renders appeal incompetent — NCLAT wrongly condoned delay in filing and refiling appeal without ensuring compliance with essential requirements.</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-05-14T14:03:28Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://sclaw.in/2026/05/14/national-highways-act-1956-section-3a1-and-3g1-compensation-applicability-of-right-to-fair-compensation-and-transparency-in-land-acquisition-rehabilitation-and-rese/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-05-14T14:00:26Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Supreme Court of India  Judgements  </news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>National Highways Act, 1956 — Section 3A(1) and 3G(1) — Compensation — Applicability of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (2013 LA Act) — Held that provisions of 2013 LA Act regarding determination of compensation apply to land acquisition under NH Act.</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-05-14T14:00:26Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://sclaw.in/2026/05/14/criminal-procedure-code-1973-crpc-section-482-quashing-of-criminal-proceedings-high-courts-power-to-quash-allegations-in-complaint-even-if-taken-at-face/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-05-14T13:55:53Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Supreme Court of India  Judgements  </news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>. Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 482 — Quashing of Criminal Proceedings — High Court&amp;#039;s power to quash — Allegations in complaint, even if taken at face value, do not prima facie constitute any offence or make out a case against the accused — High Court failed to exercise its power under Section 482 CrPC</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-05-14T13:55:53Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://sclaw.in/2026/05/14/criminal-procedure-code-1973-crpc-investigation-and-chargesheet-filing-interim-order-restraining-police-from-filing-chargesheet-is-unsustainable-if-based-on-misinterpretation-of/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-05-14T13:52:54Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Supreme Court of India  Judgements  </news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Investigation and Chargesheet Filing — Interim order restraining police from filing chargesheet is unsustainable if based on misinterpretation of law regarding High Court&amp;#039;s power under Article 226 and Section 528 of BNSS — Investigation may continue, but further steps depend on legal applicability of quashing provisions.</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-05-14T13:52:54Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://sclaw.in/2026/05/14/supreme-court-rules-2013-order-12-rule-3-correction-of-clerical-or-arithmetical-mistakes-or-errors-from-accidental-slip-or-omission-application-seeking-clarification-and/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-05-14T13:50:08Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Supreme Court of India  Judgements  </news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>Supreme Court Rules, 2013 — Order 12 Rule 3 — Correction of clerical or arithmetical mistakes or errors from accidental slip or omission — Application seeking clarification and correction regarding variance between dictated order and signed order — Held, Apex Court dismissed the application as not maintainable in law and on merits — Digitally signed order uploaded on the website is the final order — Miscellaneous applications in disposed of matters are maintainable only for correcting clerical or arithmetical errors or when the order is executory and impossible to implement due to subsequent events.</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-05-14T13:50:08Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://sclaw.in/2026/05/14/service-law-appointment-advertisement-for-regular-posts-appellant-applied-for-assistant-professor-on-regular-basis-as-per-advertisement-for-pay-band-iv-and-pay-band-iii/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-05-14T13:47:13Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Supreme Court of India  Judgements  </news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>Service Law — Appointment — Advertisement for regular posts — Appellant applied for Assistant Professor on regular basis as per advertisement for Pay Band-IV and Pay Band-III. The advertisement did not mention any contractual appointments.</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-05-14T13:47:13Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://sclaw.in/2026/05/14/criminal-procedure-code-1973-section-161-evidence-act-1872-section-157-and-145-hostile-witness-evidence-of-a-hostile-witness-remains-admissible-and/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-05-14T13:44:07Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Supreme Court of India  Judgements  </news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Section 161 — Evidence Act, 1872 — Section 157 and 145 — Hostile Witness — Evidence of a hostile witness remains admissible and can be accepted to the extent that their version is found dependable on careful scrutiny, and can be used to acquit the accused if it inspires credibility when read with other evidence — Such evidence can be employed to discredit the prosecution case.</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-05-14T13:44:07Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://sclaw.in/2026/05/14/arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996-section-11-appointment-of-arbitrator-dispute-regarding-existence-of-arbitration-agreement-held-incorporation-of-arbitrat/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-05-14T13:41:47Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Supreme Court of India  Judgements  </news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 11 — Appointment of arbitrator — Dispute regarding existence of arbitration agreement — Held, incorporation of arbitration clause from earlier document into later contract requires clear intention to incorporate, not mere reference.</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-05-14T13:41:47Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://sclaw.in/2026/05/12/constitution-of-india-1950-article-226-exercise-of-writ-jurisdiction-high-courts-power-under-article-226-is-extraordinary-and-discretionary-subject-to-self-imposed-re/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-05-12T15:19:14Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Supreme Court of India  Judgements  </news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 226 — Exercise of Writ Jurisdiction — High Court&amp;#039;s power under Article 226 is extraordinary and discretionary, subject to self-imposed restrictions — Ordinarily, it should not be exercised when an effective alternative remedy is available to the aggrieved person, such as pursuing remedies under statutory frameworks like the CrPC or BNSS, unless specific exceptions apply.</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-05-12T15:19:14Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://sclaw.in/2026/05/12/consumer-protection-act-1986-applicability-of-order-22-of-cpc-to-death-of-parties-section-137-made-order-22-of-cpc-applicable-to-death-of-complainant-or-opposite-party-allowing/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-05-12T15:16:51Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Supreme Court of India  Judgements  </news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Applicability of Order 22 of CPC to death of parties — Section 13(7) made Order 22 of CPC applicable to death of complainant or opposite party, allowing substitution of legal heirs if the right to sue survives — This procedural rule must be harmoniously construed with substantive law like Section 306 of Indian Succession Act, 1925, which governs survivability of causes of action</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-05-12T15:16:51Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://sclaw.in/2026/05/12/service-law-recruitment-rules-eligibility-criteria-date-of-possession-of-qualification-for-recruitment-to-the-post-of-assistant-prosecution-officer-the-essenti/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-05-12T15:13:43Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Supreme Court of India  Judgements  </news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>Service Law — Recruitment Rules — Eligibility Criteria — Date of Possession of Qualification — For recruitment to the post of Assistant Prosecution Officer, the essential educational qualification must be possessed by the candidate on the date of submission of the application, not at a later stage like the interview or examination date.</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-05-12T15:13:43Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://sclaw.in/2026/05/12/public-administration-and-service-rules-interpretation-of-merger-of-departments-and-promotion-rules-the-supreme-court-set-aside-the-high-courts-judgment-that-questioned-a-governm/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-05-12T15:10:15Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Supreme Court of India  Judgements  </news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>Public Administration and Service Rules — Interpretation of merger of departments and promotion rules — The Supreme Court set aside the High Court&amp;#039;s judgment that questioned a government order (G.O.) granting a notional promotion to an employee — The Court found that the original G.O — was issued in compliance with prior High Court orders and a merger policy that was not challenged by any party, thus validating the promotion and subsequent advancements.</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-05-12T15:10:15Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://sclaw.in/2026/05/12/companies-act-1956-sections-397-398-41-and-227-member-of-a-company-locus-standi-to-file-petition-for-oppression-and-mismanagement-essential-requirement-is/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-05-12T15:07:51Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Supreme Court of India  Judgements  </news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>Companies Act, 1956 — Sections 397, 398, 41 and 2(27) — Member of a company — Locus standi to file petition for oppression and mismanagement — Essential requirement is not just formal entry in register of members, but also equitable consideration of proprietary interest and conduct of the company treating the person as a member</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-05-12T15:07:51Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://sclaw.in/2026/05/12/narcotic-drugs-and-psychotropic-substances-act-1985-sections-8c-20biic-and-291-bail-petitioner-granted-bail-by-supreme-court-after-being-in-judicial-custody-f/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-05-12T15:03:55Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Supreme Court of India  Judgements  </news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(c) and 29(1) — Bail — Petitioner granted bail by Supreme Court after being in judicial custody for over a year, despite charge being framed, with no witnesses examined yet.</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-05-12T15:03:55Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://sclaw.in/2026/05/12/corporate-veil-lifting-of-may-be-lifted-where-associated-companies-are-inextricably-connected-forming-part-of-one-concern-or-to-prevent-evasion-of-obligations-or-protect-public-i/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-05-12T15:00:49Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Supreme Court of India  Judgements  </news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>Corporate Veil — Lifting of — May be lifted where associated companies are inextricably connected, forming part of one concern, or to prevent evasion of obligations or protect public interest. In this case, subsidiary companies were found to be mere fronts for the holding company&amp;#039;s development activities, justifying lifting the corporate veil.</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-05-12T15:00:49Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://sclaw.in/2026/05/12/contempt-of-courts-act-1971-section-2c-criminal-contempt-publication-of-scandalous-matter-or-doing-any-act-that-scandalises-or-tends-to-scandalise-lowers-or-tends-to/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-05-12T14:56:32Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Supreme Court of India  Judgements  </news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 — Section 2(c) — Criminal Contempt — Publication of scandalous matter or doing any act that scandalises or tends to scandalise, lowers or tends to lower the authority of any court, prejudices or interferes with judicial proceedings, or obstructs justice — Appellant, President of the Gujarat High Court Advocates’ Association and a senior advocate, made unwarranted and disreputable allegations in a press conference against the High Court and its Registry, calling it a ‘gambling den’ and alleging preferential treatment — The High Court initiated suo motu criminal contempt proceedings against the Appellant. Judicial Magnanimity and Reform — The Supreme Court demonstrated exceptional magnanimity and a desire for reform by suspending the conviction and sentence, emphasizing that while accountability is paramount, it must be balanced with patience to guide and elevate, rather than resorting to punitive destruction.</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-05-12T14:56:32Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://sclaw.in/2026/05/12/scheduled-castes-and-scheduled-tribes-prevention-of-atrocities-act-1989-sc-st-act-sections-31r-and-31s-essential-ingredient-in-any-place-within-public-view/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-05-12T14:52:58Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Supreme Court of India  Judgements  </news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (SC/ST Act) — Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) — Essential ingredient — &amp;quot;in any place within public view&amp;quot; — Both sections require the act of insult, intimidation, or abuse to occur in a place visible to the public — This is a mandatory condition for constituting the offence.</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-05-12T14:52:58Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://sclaw.in/2026/05/12/uttar-pradesh-panchayat-raj-act-1947-section-12c-election-dispute-candidate-challenging-election-results-prescribed-authority-passed-an-order-allowing-the-elec/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-05-12T14:50:40Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Supreme Court of India  Judgements  </news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 — Section 12C — Election Dispute — Candidate challenging election results — Prescribed Authority passed an order allowing the election petition and directing recounting of votes — Later, after recounting, the authority declared the appellant as the returned candidate — The High Court set aside this order — The Supreme Court held that once the Prescribed Authority passes a final order allowing the election petition, it becomes functus officio and loses jurisdiction to pass further orders — The initial order directing recounting was deemed final, not interim, as it allowed the petition and rejected the respondent&amp;#039;s statement, leaving no scope for further orders after recounting — The High Court was correct in quashing the subsequent proceedings and the declaration of the appellant as elected — Appeal dismissed.</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-05-12T14:50:40Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://sclaw.in/2026/05/12/criminal-law-dying-declarations-legal-position-is-that-a-truthful-and-voluntary-dying-declaration-if-reliable-can-be-the-sole-basis-for-conviction-in-this-case-dying-d/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-05-12T14:47:04Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Supreme Court of India  Judgements  </news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>Criminal Law — Dying Declarations — Legal position is that a truthful and voluntary dying declaration, if reliable, can be the sole basis for conviction — In this case, dying declarations were found reliable and corroborated by surrounding circumstances and other witnesses — Defence argument about deceased&amp;#039;s unconsciousness rejected.</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-05-12T14:47:04Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://sclaw.in/2026/05/12/specific-relief-act-1963-section-281-and-284-decree-for-specific-performance-executability-non-deposit-of-balance-sale-consideration-within-stipulated-time/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-05-12T08:30:22Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Supreme Court of India  Judgements  </news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>Specific Relief Act, 1963 — Section 28(1) and 28(4) — Decree for specific performance — Executability — Non-deposit of balance sale consideration within stipulated time — Plaintiff&amp;#039;s failure to deposit balance sale consideration within three months as stipulated in the decree — No application for extension of time filed within the stipulated period — Contract deemed rescinded and decree rendered inexecutable</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-05-12T08:30:22Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://sclaw.in/2026/05/12/medical-ethics-declaration-forms-doctors-are-required-to-disclose-all-previous-faculty-positions-held-in-the-same-academic-year-to-ensure-transparency-in-mci-assessments/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-05-12T08:28:06Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Supreme Court of India  Judgements  </news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>Medical Ethics — Declaration Forms — Doctors are required to disclose all previous faculty positions held in the same academic year to ensure transparency in MCI assessments — Mis-declaration or withholding such information amounts to serious misconduct.</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-05-12T08:28:06Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
 <url>
  <loc>https://sclaw.in/2026/05/12/motor-vehicles-act-1988-sections-166-and-173-compensation-calculation-notional-income-for-a-14-year-old-claimant-with-100-permanent-disability-assessed-at-rs-35800-p/</loc>
  <lastmod>2026-05-12T08:24:01Z</lastmod>
  <news:news>
   <news:publication>
    <news:name>Supreme Court of India  Judgements  </news:name>
    <news:language>en</news:language>
   </news:publication>
   <news:title>Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Sections 166 and 173 — Compensation calculation — Notional income for a 14-year-old claimant with 100% permanent disability assessed at Rs. 35,800/- per month, leading to a total loss of income of Rs. 3,17,53,920/- after applying multiplier and future prospects.</news:title>
   <news:publication_date>2026-05-12T08:24:01Z</news:publication_date>
   <news:genres>Blog</news:genres>
  </news:news>
 </url>
</urlset>
