https://sclaw.in/2026/04/03/companies-act-2013-section-185-loan-to-directors-violation-of-section-185-loan-from-company-to-director-for-securing-bail-without-special-resolution/ 2026-04-03T13:47:54Z Supreme Court of India Judgements en Companies Act, 2013 — Section 185 — Loan to directors — Violation of Section 185 — Loan from company to director for securing bail without special resolution — Deposit of Rs. 50 Crores for bail sourced from company funds without proper approval — Held to be not sustainable in law. 2026-04-03T13:45:23Z Blog https://sclaw.in/2026/04/03/contract-law-termination-and-blacklisting-principles-of-judicial-review-courts-must-apply-distinct-standards-of-legality-rationality-and-proportionality-when-reviewing/ 2026-04-03T13:42:51Z Supreme Court of India Judgements en Contract Law — Termination and Blacklisting — Principles of Judicial Review — Courts must apply distinct standards of legality, rationality, and proportionality when reviewing administrative actions related to contract termination and blacklisting, considering the differing gravity of these measures and their consequences. 2026-04-03T13:42:51Z Blog https://sclaw.in/2026/04/03/service-law-disciplinary-proceedings-punishment-judicial-review-the-courts-power-to-review-punishment-is-limited-and-generally-does-not-allow-substitution-of/ 2026-04-03T13:39:23Z Supreme Court of India Judgements en Service Law — Disciplinary proceedings — Punishment — Judicial review — The court's power to review punishment is limited and generally does not allow substitution of its own judgment for that of the disciplinary authority unless the punishment is illogical, suffers from procedural impropriety, or shocks the conscience of the court 2026-04-03T13:39:23Z Blog https://sclaw.in/2026/04/03/waqf-act-1995-section-3i-and-section-322g-jurisdiction-of-civil-court-versus-waqf-board-distinction-between-sajjadanashin-and-mutawalli-sajjadanashin-is/ 2026-04-03T13:34:04Z Supreme Court of India Judgements en Waqf Act, 1995 — Section 3(i) and Section 32(2)(g) — Jurisdiction of Civil Court versus Waqf Board — Distinction between Sajjadanashin and Mutawalli — Sajjadanashin is a spiritual head with religious duties, while Mutawalli is a secular manager of Waqf property — Waqf Board has jurisdiction over appointment and removal of Mutawallis but not Sajjadanashins — Civil Court retains jurisdiction over disputes concerning the office of Sajjadanashin — High Court wrongly held Civil Court lacked jurisdiction. 2026-04-03T13:34:04Z Blog