https://sclaw.in/2026/08/16/legal-representatives-can-claim-motor-accident-compensation-even-without-financial-dependency-on-deceased/ 2026-08-16T13:53:44Z Supreme Court of India Judgements en Legal Representatives Can Claim Motor Accident Compensation Even Without Financial Dependency On Deceased 2026-08-16T13:53:44Z Blog https://sclaw.in/2026/08/16/execution-of-unregistered-agreement-to-sell-does-not-terminate-subsisting-landlord-tenant-relationship-nor-entitle-tenant-to-section-53a-tp-act-protection-a-transfer-of-property-act-1882/ 2026-08-16T07:46:59Z Supreme Court of India Judgements en Execution Of Unregistered Agreement To Sell Does Not Terminate Subsisting Landlord-Tenant Relationship Nor Entitle Tenant To Section 53A TP Act Protection A. Transfer of Property Act, 1882 — Section 111(e) & (f) — Landlord and Tenant — Determination of lease by express or implied surrender — Execution of agreement to sell by landlord in favour of tenant — Effect on jural relationship — Held, mere execution of an agreement to sell between landlord and tenant does not ipso facto determine the subsisting tenancy — Tenancy is determined only when terms of agreement or unequivocal conduct of parties disclose express or implied surrender — Where agreement to sell contained clause for cancellation and restoration of possession in case loan was not sanctioned, existing possession was referable to tenancy and not to agreement to sell — Landlord-tenant relationship continued to subsist. 2026-08-16T07:46:59Z Blog https://sclaw.in/2026/08/16/appellate-courts-should-not-remand-cases-under-order-41-rule-23-cpc-as-a-matter-of-course-when-sufficient-evidence-is-available-on-record-a-civil-procedure-code-1908-cpc-order-41-rules/ 2026-08-16T07:43:11Z Supreme Court of India Judgements en Appellate Courts Should Not Remand Cases Under Order 41 Rule 23 CPC As A Matter Of Course When Sufficient Evidence Is Available On Record. A. Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 41 Rules 23 and 24 — Power of Appellate Court to remand — Remand of case to Trial Court for framing of additional issues and fresh evidence — Permissibility — High Court remitted suit regarding one item of property for framing issues on whether sale deed was sham, limitation, and possession — Held, remand is not to be adopted as a matter of ordinary course and reflects incorrect exercise of discretion when sufficient evidence is available on record — Issues already framed by Trial Court were comprehensive enough to cover core disputes — Appellate Court is fully empowered to decide issues on merits or admit additional evidence if warranted, rather than remitting matter to cause unnecessary delay — Remand set aside and appeals restored to High Court for fresh disposal on merits. 2026-08-16T07:43:11Z Blog https://sclaw.in/2026/08/16/extended-period-of-limitation-under-proviso-to-section-11a-central-excise-act-cannot-be-invoked-when-facts-are-known-to-department-without-wilful-suppression-a-central-excise-act-1944-se/ 2026-08-16T07:37:01Z Supreme Court of India Judgements en Extended Period Of Limitation Under Proviso To Section 11A, Central Excise Act Cannot Be Invoked When Facts Are Known To Department Without Wilful Suppression A. Central Excise Act, 1944 — Section 35L — Maintainability of appeal before Supreme Court — Preliminary objection raised by Department that appeal does not come under Section 35L as issue had no relation to rate of duty or valuation — Held, issue raised regarding extended period of limitation on ground of non-inclusion of certain costs in assessable value has an inextricable link with valuation of goods for purposes of assessment — Issue raised in show cause notice fundamentally dealt with valuation of goods — Supreme Court declined to relegate matter to High Court after almost a decade of pendency — Preliminary objection rejected. 2026-08-16T07:37:01Z Blog