sclaw.in
Consumer Complaint - Deficiency of service or defect - Adverse reaction due to administration of vaccine Engerix-B - Non-mentioning of myositis being suffered as an adverse reaction in the literature accompanying the injection or on the vial not amounts to deficiency of service, more particularly when the adverse reaction was minimal only to the extent of 0.02 in one million - If the matter is looked at from its correct perspective it is seen that except for the appellant assuming that he has suffered myositis and the cause for the same was the Engerix-B vaccine being administered, the same has not been established with the minimal required evidence to conclude even on preponderance of probability - Complaint dismissed - Supreme Court of India Judgements
(2023) 11 SCALE 325 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH PRAKASH BANG — Appellant Vs. GLAXO SMITHKLINE PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. AND ANOTHER — Respondent ( Before : A.S. Bopanna and Prashant Kumar Mishra, JJ. ) Civil Appeal No. 6791 of 2013 Decided on : 05-09-2023 Consumer Complaint – Deficiency of service or defect – Adverse reaction […]
sclaw